- Nov 16, 2022
- 1,334
- 3,096
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
His wankfest for the English cricket team was on par with Mel Jones in the 2023 seriesI hope Howie loses his voice he was annoying this test
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
His wankfest for the English cricket team was on par with Mel Jones in the 2023 seriesI hope Howie loses his voice he was annoying this test
I don't think Brook has all the talent in the world and nor do I believe the hyperbole of the English press stating that man for man they are a more talented side than Australia.Harry Brook has all the talent in the world. Could be the next Root or Smith.
Bazball is consigning him to be the next Damien Martyn.
Too 15 easily?Top 15 easily. Could make an argument for top 20, but he’s ended with an average of 47 with 13 tons it’s an outstanding career. He was a better bat than Warner
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Pretty sure Piers requested Lee to bowl full speed at him as he didn't want people thinking Brett was being soft on him.
The difference between that those batsmen had played many more tests. Pope and Martyn similar.You're the one who compared career runs, champ. I just did the same.
Ollie Pope has scored near enough the amount of runs Damien Martyn did.
Mike Atherton scored more or less the same amount of runs as Chappell and Bradman.
Doesn't mean they're remotely comparable in terms of impact.
Test average against England was worst than just about every other country.
Too 15 easily?
Bradman
Smith
Ponting
Waugh
Waugh
Hayden
Langer
Chappell
Chappell
Border
Taylor
Harvey
Warner
Gilchrist
Walters
Ponsford
Lawry
Simpson
Clarke
Boon
Slater
And he is a very decent human being.I'd have Martyn over Brook in my XI any day.
Averaged 37 against England. Similar toyeah only averaged 40 with the bat against the poms in the UK![]()
Sri Lanka 2003-2004, perhaps? Scored consecutive second innings hundreds.
Feel like averaging ~35 and averaging ~47 is a pretty big difference.The difference between that those batsmen had played many more tests. Pope and Martyn similar.
See how your argument fails when you try to add 1 and 1 and try to make 3?
Champ.
But old mate was arguing about pure run comparisons was he not??Feel like averaging ~35 and averaging ~47 is a pretty big difference.
To make the point that your comparison of Damien Martyn and Ollie Pope by virtue of them having scored a similar number of overall runs was somewhat disingenuous, yes.But old mate was arguing about pure run comparisons was he not??
It was pretty revealing how little Cummins asked him to bowl in the 3rd Test though when his bowling should have been critical - bowling fewer than 10 overs out of England's 100 overs faced across both innings. Cummins did ease him into the series after that though, when he realised it might have been a missed opportunity to win that close test if he wasn't so conservative in being worried about losing the gameMurphy took 7 wickets at 25, thought he did alright personally.
Maybe not a metre but they were humungous no-balls (you can see on the video)
and ??Averaged 37 against England. Similar to
Ollie Pope career average so far.
At Pope's age, Marto had played what, 8 tests? And been thrown to the wolves 6 years earlier for a rash shot at the SCG that his senior NSW teammates choked on? Yet, Bazball would have lauded his lazy shot with 7 runs left for victory in the test as a moral victory.The difference between that those batsmen had played many more tests. Pope and Martyn similar.
See how your argument fails when you try to add 1 and 1 and try to make 3?
Champ.
Nope!To make the point that your comparison of Damien Martyn and Ollie Pope by virtue of them having scored a similar number of overall runs was somewhat disingenuous, yes.
Alright!Nope!
Ponting wasn't fast-tracked. He had two years of first-class cricket and 2,000+ runs in the Shield before his test debut.That's not the Australian way. If you prefer to compare averages and runs aggregates then England is probably more your go, as in the past they've fallen back on the dad's army selection approach.
When a player is noted as a prodigious talent he will get fast tracked - as he should. This goes back to Ian Craig, picked for Australia before he was 18 and captain by the age of 22. Same goes for Michael Clarke and Ricky Ponting who won't required to undergo a lengthy Shield apprenticeships; selected on talent and potential.
In addition, an inspired call on talent by picking Connolly over Renshaw is not exactly denying the national team a prodigious talent. Anyone, that saw Renshaw struggling to lay a bat on the Indian spinners a few years ago would be aware that he is limited and not exactly a difference maker. .