- Joined
- Jun 4, 2005
- Posts
- 25,865
- Reaction score
- 21,380
- Location
- Putney
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood
Agree.Im not a fan of moving on vetrans and i believe they hold so much value to the development of the kids
both on the field and at training.
They were all great in 2025 (all in top 10 of the Tigers BnF), how are Richmond going to replace them?personally i am hoping our players like Nank , Prestia , Broad , Vlastuin etc play as long as they possibly can whilst contributing.
Will the Tigers battle to win 5 games in 2026 of they fall away?
Senior AFL quality is what you want.But my point was quality is quality and top end kids are that because they have a higher level of talent and i think the stats would agree with kids taken in the top 10 to later playing more games and achieving success
There is no guarantee that the kids come good, or even stay with Richmond if they do come good.
Tigers fans are basically back where Carlton fans were a decade ago (after being sold they needed to go full scorched earth rebuild).
Carlton had all the talented early draft picks that meant they drafted - Weiterz, McKay, Curnow, SPS, Dow, O'Brien TDK, Walsh - plus they "smartly" traded for a glut of GWS early picks in Marchbank, Sumner, Pickett, Plowman.
Carlton fans were sold that just needed to sit back and wait, cop the shit seasons until the kids developed...and so their fans lapped up the we will be great in 4-5 years mantra (what Tiger fans are doing now).
But after all the wasted seasons saw Carlton getting a couple of 5-8 finishes, Carlton fans are once again talking about 4-5 years into he future.
But that is what the "experts" think Collingwood need to do??




