Werewolf Work it out Werewolf

[Shueygod]

So either the arsonist has had terrible luck and hit two NI in two consecutive nights, or it's Headless and he's unknowingly found the SK in the process.

Good job Headless

If this is the case ClarkeM would be the vote today,Headless can’t kill anyone tonight.

 

[Headless]

So either the arsonist has had terrible luck and hit two NI in two consecutive nights, or it's Headless and he's unknowingly found the SK in the process.

Good job Headless

"unknowingly"

 

[Nothing]

ClarkeM

Cadsky

 

[Pie 4 Life]

If this is the case ClarkeM would be the vote today,Headless can’t kill anyone tonight.

I think the plan would be:

Lynch ClarkeM
If the Flog can use two actions (and hasn't so far) then roleblock and kill JHF
Tomorrow can be Headless


Unless someone has something more concrete?

 

[ZergMinion]

5/8 and 3/8, Arsonist likely had 2 x unsuccessful.

Both nights would need to have targetted someone with night immunity or protection. Pretty unlucky.

It's why I picked PG last night as the former amulet holder. Unless Nothing and PG are both night immune I think I'm not the arsonist.

 

[Shueygod]

There’s also a scenario where JHF1870 is Doc and I’m the Role Blocker (despite the mare he’s had) so from a village perspective it’s likely a better play.

 

[Headless]

I think the plan would be:

Lynch ClarkeM
If the Flog can use two actions (and hasn't so far) then roleblock and kill JHF
Tomorrow can be Headless


Unless someone has something more concrete?

By "tomorrow can be Headless", do you mean tomorrow I'll get some sort of special service award?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

By "tomorrow can be Headless", do you mean tomorrow I'll get some sort of special service award?

I think we'll all be shouting your names and letting Cadsky know what a great job you've done.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

A ClarkeM lynch also will confirm Headless one way or another.

ClarkeM

Cadsky

 

[Headless]

In all seriousness, I think the play has to be Pie 4 Life. Pie couldn't have had the amulet N1 based on JHF1870's claim, and based on their usual game style, I can't see Pie posting more often than usual to hide in plain sight.

It's possible WAbulldog is the zombie, but it seems pretty unlikely at this point.

It has to be Pie.

Pie 4 Life
Cadsky

 

[ZergMinion]

I think the plan would be:

Lynch ClarkeM
If the Flog can use two actions (and hasn't so far) then roleblock and kill JHF
Tomorrow can be Headless


Unless someone has something more concrete?

Who did headless target night 1 again?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Who did headless target night 1 again?

ClarkeM both nights.

 

[Headless]

I think we'll all be shouting your names and letting Cadsky know what a great job you've done.

I am choosing to take this as a compliment.

 

[cats_09]

Numbers wise, this is what I had as reasons for “Unsuccessful” messages this morning:

Potential reasons for Unsuccessful over night actions

3 x NI - Godfather, Alpha & SK
2 x Potential protects - Doc & Amulet in play
1 x Role Blocker
8 x roles with no applicable night action: Mafiso, Beta, Flogs x 1 & Village x 5 (I hadn’t read the Flog actions correctly yesterday as they have no actions until they form as a Faction which has now happened)
1 x impotent Arsonist

 

[Headless]

Who did headless target night 1 again?

Why don't you just ask me directly, Zerg?

 

[Proper Gander]

Because if someone had worked out what their role is based on N1, they might change to something different. Hence why I was happy to release who I targeted post-deadline but before the announcement.

Okay.

I’m working on the assumption that you are the tracker given tracker no 2 hasn’t put in an appearance as yet (though could also have been unlucky with NI I guess) but I’ll stick with this anyway.

With that in mind, was it MC who determined yesterday to cast doubt or am I remembering that wrongly?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

In all seriousness, I think the play has to be Pie 4 Life. Pie couldn't have had the amulet N1 based on JHF1870's claim, and based on their usual game style, I can't see Pie posting more often than usual to hide in plain sight.

It's possible WAbulldog is the zombie, but it seems pretty unlikely at this point.

It has to be Pie.

Pie 4 Life
Cadsky

Surprisingly this makes less sense than the Terms of Service. You never fail to entertain, Headless!

 

[Shueygod]

Will go with ClarkeM thanks Cadsky

 

[Proper Gander]

In all seriousness, I think the play has to be Pie 4 Life. Pie couldn't have had the amulet N1 based on JHF1870's claim, and based on their usual game style, I can't see Pie posting more often than usual to hide in plain sight.

It's possible WAbulldog is the zombie, but it seems pretty unlikely at this point.

It has to be Pie.

Pie 4 Life
Cadsky

I never know when you are real

 

[Headless]

Surprisingly this makes less sense than the Terms of Service. You never fail to entertain, Headless!

Precisely what evil would say.

 

[ZergMinion]

Why don't you just ask me directly, Zerg?

I didn't want to risk it.

ClarkeM Cadsky

 

[ClarkeM]

Well hang on now just for a moment, the theory stands up - sure, but I can't be the Serial Killer and I don't know what I am. I know I'm not a killing role, that's as far as i know at the moment.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Okay.

I’m working on the assumption that you are the tracker given tracker no 2 hasn’t put in an appearance as yet (though could also have been unlucky with NI I guess) but I’ll stick with this anyway.

With that in mind, was it MC who determined yesterday to cast doubt or am I remembering that wrongly?

It was MC at the end of the day.

I think the fact I worked out who Shueygod tracked (and they admitted it) should give greater credence to any doubts.

 

[Headless]

ClarkeM, are we on a team? Am I doing well?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Well hang on now just for a moment, the theory stands up - sure, but I can't be the Serial Killer and I don't know what I am. I know I'm not a killing role, that's as far as i know at the moment.

The only other scenario is that the arsonist has hit two night immune people in a horrible run of bad luck.