Werewolf Work it out Werewolf

[Pie 4 Life]

why dont you ask the village? Surely someone knows by now

I have trust issues!

 

[Cadsky]

You do realise how much the answer determines major things within the game though right?

exactly why im not giving you the answer.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

exactly why im not giving you the answer.

 

[Nothing]

Crimson, MC & THB

I believe all 3 are also trailing at the back of the pack in terms of contributions to the thread

Perhaps we start at MCBG then

Cadsky

 

[ClarkeM]

Clarkey knew claiming two random unsuccessful results ends up in his death. Had to try something.

My results were successful. Can you please try and read?

 

[ClarkeM]

Yeah Pie 4 Life, work it the **** out please for the rest of us

 

[cats_09]

Perhaps we start at MCBG then

Cadsky

I’m happy to look at a quiet one also

MCBG

Cheers, Cadsky

 

[Gralin]

You do realise how much the answer determines major things within the game though right?

yes but I'll just melt at Cadsky if he's ****ed up the mechanics that badly

 

[ZergMinion]

I love a good MCBG lynch Cadsky

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Yeah Pie 4 Life, work it the **** out please for the rest of us

Either you're 2IC for an evil group or someone out of the three of you is lying (which opens up a whole heap of possibilities, especially if it ends up being you). Essentially it doesn't make sense to get Successful readings without actions unless one of the others is lying (and you're doc or RB) or I'm right about the 2IC getting successful readings.

 

[Shueygod]

My results were successful. Can you please try and read?

I’m aware, I’m explaining to pie4life why you would go to the lengths of claiming successful if it weren’t necessary to do so.

As it would be the only way to try get the mob off your back.

Unsuccessful = even if he’s telling the truth and he’s good it’s only a villager
Successful = if he’s telling the truth he might be a doc.

Can you please try and read?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

yes but I'll just melt at Cadsky if he's ****ed up the mechanics that badly

I miss the days where you just accidentally gave people the role list.

 

[Shueygod]

Jesus Christ, ClarkeM is the obvious vote here. How have some of you been so easily fooled by this blatant pretence of not knowing what’s going on.

 

[Gralin]

Jesus Christ, ClarkeM is the obvious vote here. How have some of you been so easily fooled by this blatant pretence of not knowing what’s going on.

 

[cats_09]

Or we go a multi and take out 2 at once

 

[King Tenz]

Jesus Christ, ClarkeM is the obvious vote here. How have some of you been so easily fooled by this blatant pretence of not knowing what’s going on.

Out of the loop.

Why Clarke?

 

[King Tenz]

But yes.

MCBG Cadsky

 

[Gralin]

I miss the days where you just accidentally gave people the role list.

i think i have an idea of a game!

 

[Footypie32]

Or we go a multi and take out 2 at once

Calm down, Rambo.

It's still a crapshoot right now.

 

[ClarkeM]

Out of the loop.

Why Clarke?

I think Shuey knows something the rest of us don’t (me included)

 

[ClarkeM]

Jesus Christ, ClarkeM is the obvious vote here. How have some of you been so easily fooled by this blatant pretence of not knowing what’s going on.

No I’m not.

 

[Shueygod]

Timeline of events:

P4L follows me and sees me visit 3KZ.

I explain based on my actions I’m either Doc or Roleblocker but slightly more likely Doc.

JHF not knowing about the Roleblocker role claims that he’s actually the Doc as it’s all he could be, zero reason for him to do this as there wasn’t a lot of heat on him.

ClarkeM starts getting heat on him as Headless targeted him twice and got unsuccessful meaning the most likely scenario is Headless is Arsonist and Clarke a night immune role (alternates Headless lying/Arsonist getting blocked back to back) given we know that myself and JHF are likely the only two roles capable of doing so and JHF wasted one on P4L last night it makes the arsonist getting blocked twice pretty unlikely.

Once Clarke got heat on him he claimed to not know the roles well, and happened to describe the Doc/RB ability. Literally the one play that could save him from a lynch. (Claims unsuccessful it’s worth the risk of losing a villager, claims seering he’s likely NI).

This is an absolute layup of a vote and village is fumbling.

 

[ClarkeM]

Timeline of events:

P4L follows me and sees me visit 3KZ.

I explain based on my actions I’m either Doc or Roleblocker but slightly more likely Doc.

JHF not knowing about the Roleblocker role claims that he’s actually the Doc as it’s all he could be, zero reason for him to do this as there wasn’t a lot of heat on him.

ClarkeM starts getting heat on him as Headless targeted him twice and got unsuccessful meaning the most likely scenario is Headless is Arsonist and Clarke a night immune role (alternates Headless lying/Arsonist getting blocked back to back) given we know that myself and JHF are likely the only two roles capable of doing so and JHF wasted one on P4L last night it makes the arsonist getting blocked twice pretty unlikely.

Once Clarke got heat on him he claimed to not know the roles well, and happened to describe the Doc/RB ability. Literally the one play that could save him from a lynch. (Claims unsuccessful it’s worth the risk of losing a villager, claims seering he’s likely NI).

This is an absolute layup of a vote and village is fumbling.

My vote is currently on me and I’ve not presented any lies. Lynch me all you please and desire but there’s something fishy about how desperate you are in all of this - either to lynch me or usurp Pie 4 Life as King

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Timeline of events:

P4L follows me and sees me visit 3KZ.

I explain based on my actions I’m either Doc or Roleblocker but slightly more likely Doc.

JHF not knowing about the Roleblocker role claims that he’s actually the Doc as it’s all he could be, zero reason for him to do this as there wasn’t a lot of heat on him.

ClarkeM starts getting heat on him as Headless targeted him twice and got unsuccessful meaning the most likely scenario is Headless is Arsonist and Clarke a night immune role (alternates Headless lying/Arsonist getting blocked back to back) given we know that myself and JHF are likely the only two roles capable of doing so and JHF wasted one on P4L last night it makes the arsonist getting blocked twice pretty unlikely.

Once Clarke got heat on him he claimed to not know the roles well, and happened to describe the Doc/RB ability. Literally the one play that could save him from a lynch. (Claims unsuccessful it’s worth the risk of losing a villager, claims seering he’s likely NI).

This is an absolute layup of a vote and village is fumbling.

JHF was actually defending himself being the arsonist but unknowingly ended up essentially looking like the roleblocker in the process.

 

[Shueygod]

JHF was actually defending himself being the arsonist but unknowingly ended up essentially looking like the roleblocker in the process.

Was JHF suspected to be the arsonist though? Pretty sure his main motivation was to “expose” me.

Clarkey was the only one with a real ulterior motive.