speed is overrated.
Not going to by into this debate, but the 3.2 km time trial, isn't a speed test.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
speed is overrated.
True, true. It does, however, become a much easier task when you get traded to Carlton.Really? Where did you hear that? I would of thought it would be hard to run around PP from Perth...
True, true. It does, however, become a much easier task when you get traded to Carlton.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The "NEWS" in this thread is that Laycock is taking big strides in becoming an AFL quality ruckman. After appearing to struggle with his weight and fitness, the big fellow appears to be making real efforts to hit the level required of this game. Added to his marking ability this is very big news for Essendon. With 2 fit and AFL quality big men they can still compete for the 8.
Longy correct me if Im wrong but isnt Hille generally good at this sort of thing, particularly for his size?
Longy correct me if Im wrong but isnt Hille generally good at this sort of thing, particularly for his size?
Somebody said Carlton are lazy.Weren't we the first team to come out of hibernation and start training?
True, but I know in the last few years many of the younger boys have made a focus of adding bulk early in the pre-season. Naturally that would impact on any sort of running times.This is all about the work the players have put in during their time off and the condition they come back to training in.
True, but I know in the last few years many of the younger boys have made a focus of adding bulk early in the pre-season. Naturally that would impact on any sort of running times.
Of course. I wasnt critising your post, I was just speaking from the Carlton POV.Just to clarify, I was speaking from an Essendon point of view...
Not having a dig at what Carlton were/are doing.
Different clubs have different expectations for this time of year.
Hille and Laycock did 11'26 around Princes Park yesterday. So much for the "amazing" effort of Cameron Cloke (11'46"). And hate to bang on about a point but it puts Murphy (11'41") and Gibbs (12'03") to shame.
NOT GOOD ENOUGH.![]()
Obviously the point brought up in the OP isn't that relevant, but for everyone claiming how stupid it is, their post's are just as irrelevant.
The guy didn't say they were better players than Murph or Gibbs, but in all honest its a worthwhile point being made.
Q) What was a big problem last year?
A) Our ability to run out a game, but of course since we have Judd, that won't be a problem now right
3.2Km isn't a speed trial, it shows level of fitness, and seeing as though this is a big problem of ours, then the point of this thread has some merit.
For all those that simply bagged the OP
Then again I could be wrong, how stupid that windows wants us to improve a flaw, lets everyone else just hope Judd fixes all them for us![]()
Spriggs, Chambers, David Clarke board
Why have they been delisted...
I'd take those times any day of the week
what time did you run...
of i forgot you another one of us
???? What are you trying to say? Spriggs, chambers, David Clarke were delisted because they did so well in the time trials?
If you think those times are good, then your kidding yourself.
What does Window's time trial got to do with anything?
Carlton problem last year was, we are small bodied and not fit enough to run a game out. Not saying thats going to happen over night, but players are meant to be accountable of their weight during the off season, and maintain their fitness
your a goose
1st point: i named those players because they ran the time trial in awsome times yet they are not on any1's list anymore... why... because they had no football ability, just running ability... and they are not the only ones.
2nd point: it seemed as though we were not fit enough but we didnt have the depth in the midfield to give sustained pressure throughout 4 quarters. We had a 18 & 19y/o being expected to do more than what they should be doing ala Sellwood, and a 33 y/o busting his gut to help out with our younger blokes.
Look at W.C at the beginning of last year you would see them at stages taking off Kerr and replacing him with Judd.
We would take off Murphy and bring on Bentick.
See the difference.
I agree with your point about depth being a problem, but come on, you cant seriously say fitness wasn't an issue at all last year. If we are going to improve we need to be honest with ourselves, and be critical of our weakness'.
Like I said, Im persoanlly not worried about the times, but there is also no need to bag others that are, IMO it only shows we're looking at all aspects which need improvement which is a good thing.
Its no different than people saying Walker needs to improve his kicking, or our younger guys need to bulk up.
Put it this way, since depth was such as issue last year, if anything our top line players should be working harder at their fitness levels so they can stay out there longer. And for those that say there plenty of time, I agree, but it obviously didnt do any harm to the Kangaroos to put in the hard yards early on now did it.
Hille and Laycock did 11'26 around Princes Park yesterday. So much for the "amazing" effort of Cameron Cloke (11'46"). And hate to bang on about a point but it puts Murphy (11'41") and Gibbs (12'03") to shame.
NOT GOOD ENOUGH.![]()
???? What are you trying to say? Spriggs, chambers, David Clarke were delisted because they did so well in the time trials?
If you think those times are good, then your kidding yourself.
What does Window's time trial got to do with anything?
Carlton problem last year was, we are small bodied and not fit enough to run a game out. Not saying thats going to happen over night, but players are meant to be accountable of their weight during the off season, and maintain their fitness
Well i agree with you diesel that we were small bodied and not fit enough but this can happen when you are one of, if not the youngest list in the comp. Maturity in body and mind takes time no matter how much talent a player may or may not have. Hille and Laycock have been around for quite some time now if im right? Question is which area do you try and improve first... Personally i'd think it would be best to put the bulk on first to solve our small bodied problem(which obviously would effect time trial times) and then concentrate on getting fitness levels to their optimum by round 1! It is only november remember. We have many things to work on but im sure King Dick and Swanny will make sure we have the right people on board to help us achieve this![]()
I thought Laycock didn't go too bad against your boys in round 20??Laycock is barely AFL standard (not saying we have better ruckmen)
I thought Laycock didn't go too bad against your boys in round 20??
I guess..You would hardly call Ackland a ruckman, wouldnt you?