A 1200 comment thread 15 hours after a game about frustrated fans booing random shit after what was in their mind a controversial loss.
What a ******* joke. **** every media and football personality trying to pump this nothing issue up to divide the masses.
Are they a separate group from the RA?
I have noticed in some games they will do their own chants that noone in red joins in on and nobody in red seemed to care that those guys left.
Swearing does not seem enough. Surely there was some direction and aggression behind the words.
They dramatically reduced the number of dawn services in a NZ city (Auckland I think) a couple of weeks back.
The rhetoric used at the time linked the decision to the Christchurch incident when it was pretty obvious they are terrified of reprisal attacks more than the possibility of a white...
Robert Murphy was a very self interested and narcissistic individual when wanting to captain the Bulldogs in 2017 after Easton Wood had done a fine job in 2016 and was only the second premiership captain in the clubs history.
There was absolutely no benefit to a guy turning 35 and coming back...
The Obama tweet referenced those in hotels as tourists and the Clinton one referenced travellers.
They both acknowledged the hotels and they both awkwardly used two words when they could have used one to describe those in the churches.
Next swing please.
Pretty apt comparison with the Goodes situation really.
There are a number of reasons that people may choose to boo him. It is possible that a tiny minority in the crowd may be doing it because of his religious beliefs.
The media will then choose to highlight the most divisive reason possible...