Garcia is the man. Have always liked players with a bit of aggro about them.
Not a fan of the first 10 minutes of the 3rd, but it all worked out in the end.
Feels good to win by lots again. Could sit back and simply enjoy in the 4th.
Tipping the replacement will do Trump's bidding and both lower interest rates & up quantitative easing. The economy will try to go into overdrive and fail. Inflation goes to the moon. Real estate guys love inflation, their property's retain value while their debts lose value.
https://lailluminator.com/2026/04/23/democratic-voters-shut-out-of-picking-louisianas-new-supreme-court-justice/
"The only two candidates who filed to run for the open District 1 seat, Judges Billy Burris and Blair Downing Edwards, are Republicans. That one-party field means the election will...
Way to miss the point. It does not matter if they abided by the fine print of the deal. The aid they gave was seen to be too little, too late and hedged with too many prescriptions on its use. and has ceased in any event. They are seen to have reneged on the deal. So they are not trusted...
While I am sure there is dodgy stuff going on in Israel's elections. If the voters if Israel really really wanted him gone they could do what the people of Hungary just did. It is not as if Israel's elections are Russian levels of farce.
There is no need for him to win a "convincing majority"...
1984
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Laoshan
But 1979 would also be fine if a single battle is not considered enough to be considered an invasion. There was more fighting between China and Vietnam, but mostly shelling and naval stuff. Not invasions as such.
Its called OODA loop superiority. The fall of France in 1940 (6 weeks) is a classic example, where German Blitzkrieg tactics operated at a faster tempo (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act) than the slower, centralized French command. German forces shattered Allied lines by moving faster than the French...
Granted. But replace Iran with USA, Israel or Russia in your statement and it is just as true. There is no moral high ground here but for the simple fact that Iran is the attacked party.
Unacceptable is the attack on Iran in the first place. I do not have it in me to condemn the weaker attacked party for ignoring rules that are ignored by its more powerful attackers.
If Spain was actually attacked by Russia, they might well act differently. Not that I would call Spain a major...
So nations that allow the US to launch strikes on Iran from their territory are not at war. Iran is at least justified in considering them co-belligerents.
As for international law, is the attack on Iran legal under international law? No. So a weaker attacked party is to follow some law their...
If they where at war they just might and would be justified to do so. Take the Montreux convention.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreux_Convention_Regarding_the_Regime_of_the_Straits
"Also, Turkey was authorised to refuse transit from merchant ships belonging to countries at war with it."...