Recent content by Ben the Gooner

We're teetering on the brink of burning two of the biggest names in our club's history, the two names with the most combined games in their father/son line at the club.

How many single people do we need to burn to serve the wishes of a handful of muppets on the board and their masters at AFL House?

Eerily prescient words from the Fish (spoken in 2007):

Wish a few more people would listen to Kevin Sheedy's thoughts on what a football club is. His words were something along the lines of "a football club is its people. That's the most important thing".

I suppose one way to prove the club is bigger than its people is to shaft each and every one of them systematically.

But if we sack Hird it'll go away and it'll be sunshine and lollipops with the media. Right?

Source?

If you're going to spout shite, do it elsewhere.

*12

Just teasing, had a good chuckle at the Titus article last week and wanted an excuse to post it.

He'll play Rd 1. And Rd 2. And Rd 3. And so on. O'Keefe and Caddy are two examples off the top of my head, but playing him in the VFL is ridiculous from every angle.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/titus-oreily-collingwood-ignoring-the-peoples-draft-and-trade-ideas/story-fni0ffsx-1227075105780?nk=16585f0af015bc249424a72af0c685aa

Again, it's not our problem. The club is more than happy to keep a required, contracted player.

I dunno, I'm not at all convinced by the idea of "spiking" shots. If Dank wanted to use Tb4, he could have just used it as "thymosin" and no one would have said boo. There would have been no need to say there's a good and bad thymosin either.