I recall earlier in the thread someone was asking to have my hideous CFC monogram I had on my avatar removed which was popping up on the forum preview section so that may have been the reason I lost the OP. But that problem is now fixed as I have deleted the avatar..
I created this thread.
Then for some reason it was taken off me and not given back! Maybe i had a different account name back then.
I would love it if the mods could please give me back the OP so i can edit it to update yearly changes to the team like i do on all the other 17 boards!
This is the trouble with stats. Brown is one guy i really spew had to battle so many injuries in his prime then reconfigure himself as a closer to home forward cause he wasnt allowed to run the high km he was very capable of.
His 2006 season before injury struck in my opinion was the most...
Hawks had 8 that played in both 08 and 13. 2 flags was the minimum criteria.
You can change criterias to fit your own team’s players in i agree that would rob the team of buddy and then a coinflip between riewoldt and hawkins. Probably riewoldt was better in their respective flag years tbh. But...
I did toss that up too but in the end The gap between cats first to last is only 1 year less
Also like i said in OP i tried to pick bench on positions rather than just put the best 4 midfielders in who are better than birchall
As mentioned in the OP, i decided to make it a minimum of 2 flags players to better reflect the actual dynasties, which is the point of the exercise itself.
Otherwise overall id also agree rance was better than leppitsch.
Basically combining the best players from the 4 dynasty teams this century: Lions 01-03, cats 07-11, hawks 08-15 & tigers 17-20.
To make it a truer reflection of the era, I have decided to make the minimum inclusion criteria to have played in at least 2 of the flags (EDIT: Please read this part...
Could possibly replace another collingwood legend on the wing given a lot of his best was in the 90s…
But personally id want at least 10 elite seasons to get to that stage.
as much as i rated wilson and at his best he was probably better than those 2, for me he missed too many games with injury this side of the century which i think robs him of a spot. If your criteria was more at their peak, i can understand.
but as an opposition supporter, i'm very glad you...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.