Remove this Banner Ad

  • No, thats stupid. Why would the second player collude to get less value from the trade?

    I traded down, and then traded. Two clear moves and distinct moves. The lower fourth rounder reflected what I wanted to trade out. That I made use of the difference in pick value in another trade is good management.
    Dodgily nothing. Was great management skills.

    I think the trade was the right thing from your perspective. I think it was probably the right thing from mine too. I'll be light on depth now though.
    Well, im not too unhappy with it either.

    Been a hell of a long time between live picks for me though. Kind of frustrating.
    Still though, you appear to be the only real beneficiary.

    Cant help but notice you shedding your more moronic of contracts, like Willis.
    SEN has the pick after you... trading down seems pointless.

    Hurry up whatever you're doing. I'll autopick your ass some DHB goodness otherwise.
    I would have been probably annoyed had someone like Brees been available by my second. Not too worried having given up Bryant. (wont get a pass completed on us in two games this year :p)
    Loving DJ Frane's Garden of Delights at first listen right now - making me wish I had some weed to give it the full experience...
    I prefer slick to dodgy. :p

    I had confirmation on your trade, so I dont think i did anything wrong on that front. It doesnt disadvantage anyone really. You still get your fourth round upgrade.

    Realized immediately after making the trade with you that drd is a ravens fan, and that it would doom me to MJD. Oh well.
    Hmm.

    Honestly, I dont want to pay more than my first + second. Almost feel like thats paying overs too all things considered.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top