Now I think about it, I can see a similar situation to 2020 arising. I reckon in Rd 2 we’ll get the GC player average and in Rd 4 we’ll get Essendon average.
Then the score for their other game randomly in the middle of the year will just be ignored
Pretty much set on my side now (barring any rd0 hiccups).
Last decision I’m weighing up is:
Sheezel + Libba
Vs
Brayshaw + Dale
Bray and Dale both underpriced and could be best 22. Sheez a lock for best 22 while Liberatore is underpriced given the number of key dogs missing.
Thoughts?
In theory it should be a simple database change where they add the Brisbane Geelong game to rd3 and remove from rd 0. Depends how well the app was designed but if done well there should be zero code changes and could be done in a matter of minutes
I get that it’s riskier but I don’t really see the appeal in picking the top end rucks as they’re not exactly screaming value and X has a shocking opening run.
If you go cheap in the rucks you can go insanely deep across the rest of the field and I feel like the risk is mitigated by it being...
The reason I’m down to 0 in the mids is because Allan and Sheldrick (with smith and Ashcroft and Lindsay on the pine).
If neither named rd 0 it’s easy to move them down to a rookie and put the cash elsewhere