Recent content by Feerits Elf

Didn't hear this from me mate but Mr [redacted on legal advice] and Mr [redacted on legal advice] were in the closet making babies and I saw one of the babies and the baby smiled at me.

Why?

Stop replying to me then.

Yeah, but Steve the street cleaner from Frankston knows that.

Yeah but you said that in direct response to me saying he can be cross examined if he gives evidence in chief. That an accused can't be compelled to give evidence doesn't refute that if they choose to give evidence they are subject to cross examination. So what point are you trying to make?

No, that's indicative that he understands his rights.

Absolutely. It's highly probable they've found her blood in the ute they seized.

No, we can't conclude that at all. No, I don't think they are trying to allude to that.

More than their younger counterparts? That's the relevant question. You're right. I guess the criminologists should just pack it in. Jerks.

No, it indicates that that's the one that's been leaked to them.

No, it fails on the second element (the mens rea). No intent to kill when he strikes her with the car, and no knowledge that it was probable that death would occur by dumping her somewhere because he thought she was already dead.

He can be cross-examined if he gives evidence. Imagine a world where you can call a witness to be examined in chief and they aren't subject to cross-examination. Christmas every day.

100% agree. Well, except for the sexual aspect of it, I suppose. But that aside - it's not about sex at all.

Oh I get it. So the reason people sexually offend against children isn't because they're sexually attracted to children at all. It's all about power and control. I guess that explains why women are overwhelmingly the victims of sexually offending too. It's not because the perpetrators are men...

All else being equal, the preference is to dominate someone you like the look of.