Yeah, I think the gist of this thread is the team who will need to navigate their way through the 2027+ national drafts, with their high picks compromised.
Like Richmond had to do throughout the introductory years of the Suns and Giants.
I think that Richmond will be smashing the high end of...
If the ball hits a boundary umpire, it should be deemed out of bounds.
If it hits them on the full, it is deemed out on the full.
Even if the stupid fecker has his foot inside the boundary line.
It was a great mark, and will probably win mark of the year. You could be forgiven for thinking at the time that it was actually Jeremy Howe who was flying for it.
Been mentioned many times on this thread alone.
I agree on principle, and if the ball clips the post and goes through it should of course still be a goal. The current arrangement is totally ridiculous - every other decent sport worked it out a long time ago.
However, hitting the post and...
Totally appreciate that. There's a little part of my soul which evaporates each month when the subscription is paid. If I did watch so much stuff on Foxtel it would be gone in an instant. I steal his newspapers though, so hopefully that makes me a little more Murdoch carbon neutral 😁
Excellent response Rohan, and I'm sure there's plenty of posters here, including myself, that appreciate the fact that you come in and contribute to the BigFooty forum without a pseudonym and in full disclosure mode.
Added to this, with so many clickbait-driven, muck-raking gutter-tabloid...
Reminds me of when I tried to watch "Wolf of Wall Street" on an Emirates flight to Dubai about 10 years ago. With all of the editing that the highly conservative Islamic-owned airline imposed on it, the original 180 minute movie ended up going for less than 100 minutes onboard 🤣
I'd imagine...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.