From what Ned Guy said it seems that the Dogs were more focused on the Marcus Adams deal with the Lions (who also had their own priorities). It was always going to happen.
I'm just surprised that in this modern world a lot of time is still spent completing forms etc. Surely there must be an...
Nice post - I don't mind some positions being crowded as it shows depth.
as you pointed out we can't presume the team will be injury-free. Given our recent history I'm counting on it!
A couple of things which are wildcards
1) some players will lose form. Eg Stevo may get the 2nd year blues
2)...
I've reached the point of wanting to walk away from the whole thing and let Brisbane deal with the speculation.
Love Beamer but we reached the GF without him.
I'm now looking forward to Quaynor wearing #35 (as I'm guessing we trade out 18 between now and draft night)
Not a bad question someone just asked. "Who are the best and worst clubs for player development?"
Dal reckons Swans Hawks Geel are the best.
Totally disagree about Geelong - very few players have developed into anything more than mediocre types some of who eventually get traded...
Rocket Eade's just given Hall a good wrap - said that he'd suit the Kangas particularly well.
Congrats Roos you've got a good one.
And importantly he'll be on my SC team
Article misses the point that we'd rather trade out 18 for 2nds so that we have enough points for NGA and FS. No point risking someone bidding for Quaynor and forcing us into using a first rounder on him
Sorry that doesn't make any sense. By definition if Jack was required you wouldn't be contemplating trading him
It's supply and demand - Port aren't fussed about keeping him therefore clubs won't be clamouring for him
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.