Remove this Banner Ad

Recent content by Maze

  1. M

    Autopsy AFL 2025 Round 13 - Demons v Pies Mon June 9th 3:20pm AEST (MCG)

    Maybe explain how you would like a player being pushed under a marking contest without contesting the ball to be adjudicated. It's a free 100 times out of a 100. At least if you're going to sook about a call, make it an incorrect one.
  2. M

    Toast Round 2 = Western Bulldogs 70-76 Collingwood

    I've just watched the game for the 1st time. With the exception of Nic walking there ball out late and a below the knee there is very little controversial. Pies could argue, Cox certainly should have got 50 and Mcstay had clear front on contact. Most frees were warranted. Only time commentators...
  3. M

    Game Day Match Discussion - RD 1 vs. Port Adelaide. Sat 15/03 @ 7:35pm (MCG)

    I wouldn't read anything sinister at all into it. GWS had less players cramping and feeling fatigue than Pies, hence the ability to run over them. 1st game of year, no practice matches to speak of, and an opponent who didn't waste opportunity.
  4. M

    Player Watch Joel Cochran

    Kicking a bit timid and loopy but moves nicely.....I like him. Skinny kid...2-3 years!
  5. M

    List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

    Yes. CJ...They also have Denver GB who also fits that mould
  6. M

    List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

    Hawks with extra talls down back now. Get in and pinch TJ to come and join his brother....
  7. M

    Traded John Noble - Joins Gold Coast as part of 3-way trade with Port Adelaide and Collingwood

    Noble actually had a superb year. He wasn't picked at start and his inclusion was a major catalyst in improved Pies form. Irrespective of what Pies get for him, it will be a huge loss to Pies as not many players have that level of run off back line.
  8. M

    Autopsy AFL 2024 Round 15 - Blues v Cats Fri June 21st 7:40pm AEST (MCG)

    Reckon you can Chuck Bowes in there. How he got 4 years at 500k is a massive list clog
  9. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    Ha, nice try, but complete rubbish. 1. You are allowed to protect the drop of the ball area provided you contesting the ball and don't push in the back. This is a free to the held player 100 times out of 100
  10. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    Considering she admitted a mistake, I'm really not sure this males any sense 🤔
  11. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    No. The umpire didn't do what he should have done and called play on because Scott had come well off his mark. At the end of the day if you genuinely believe he didn't play on then don't bother with a response as clearly we see the game differently which is just fine by me
  12. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    Finally you're beginning to get it. The umpire did not call play on...This was admitted as an error. What part of this is confusing you?
  13. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    Do you honestly believe Kane wouldn't meet with the umpiring department and just make it up without consultation??? Seriously
  14. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    No one is claiming they can
  15. M

    Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

    The AFL's footy boss Laura Kane says once Scott took a few steps inbound, the umpire should have called play on.
See more

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom