Went in for a massage at a place in the city 2-3 years back, who do I find sitting in the reception but the one and only Chris Judd. This would be mundane enough, as it was the Monday after a big weekend of football and you would expect some kinks may need to be worked out, but as I was about...
Has anyone noticed that at least half of the AFL coaches seem to be drinking out of those strangely shaped red water bottles? What's the deal with that? Is it sponsorship, is there some scientific reason that makes the water more nutritious/taste better? What is the reason for this grand conspiracy?
How about incentivize scoring not by tweaking the structure of the rules themselves, but by offering external rewards to teams that play free flowing, attacking football? What we could do is introduce a bonus point to a team that scores over 100 points next year, or if that is too drastic, tweak...
Who are some players, that for one reason or another, have just slipped under the radar the last few years and once they pop up in discussion about certain teams make you think "F**k me, he's still around!?".
I'll start with Trent West.
Admittedly I only watched 4/9 games, but from what I could see, holding the ball was spot on, players actually being penalized for indirect disposal, as well as the amount of technical frees that add nothing to the spectacle being cut down drastically. Anyone else share my opinion?
Death, taxes, and a brad thread at the end of each round.
West Coast Vs Carlton 14 pts 38k
Richmond Vs Western Bulldogs 22 pts 43k
GWS Vs Melbourne 3 pts 11k
Collingwood Vs Adelaide 16 pts 52k
Gold Coast Vs St Kilda 38 pts 16k
Port Adelaide Vs Sydney 5 pts 43k
Geelong Vs Fremantle 6 pts...
An article on The Age website notes that 11 players in the Melbourne lineup had a win percentage of only 26% in their careers. This got me thinking about which players in the AFL have the lowest win percentage over 100 games. These would be, as the article says, the game's biggest...