Would end up something like...
Mckercher, Duursma, Goad, Dawson, Hardeman
V
Mckercher, Caddy, Curtin, Hardeman
Simplified:
Duursma, Dawson, Goad
V
Caddy, Curtin
On top 7 talent it appears break even in the simplest of comparisons, with Duursma and Curtin winning their prospective match ups...
Say what you want about trading out 3rd rounder for a future 4th, at least it wasn't as bad as
Out: 14, 27, 35
In: 11
Only to find out WC ain't interested in your 6 and 11 combo.
Deal misses Duursma & Watson.
Left with Sanders, Curtin.
Unless they went Duursma @ 2, then caught Sanders, Curtin at 5,6 to end up addressing all thirds of the ground.
Wanted pick 4, didn't get it.
Wanted pick 11, didn't get it.
North owe them nothing.
Enough evidence the "we won't bid" for getting something in return is BF fantasy.
It's a hypothetical trade scenario expanding on the post i quoted.
Not to say I prefer to trade or to hold myself, I don't have a strong opinion one way or another.
Was hoping someone might offer more of an insight on Duursma V Caddy+Osullivan actually.
If you or anyone else here thinks they...
With the CBA increase, I doubt anybody but a legitimate star of the competition will be netting band 1 going fwd.
Afl need to declare as much. "Compo will not be "purchased" by what a panel may deem as buying a higher compensation."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.