2016 US Presidential Election - Trump vs Clinton? - Part 1

[WA ROO]

Given GWBogan's post has a ream of likes,

5 including yours
The clique does stick together

 

[JackNah_8]

Lol he's voting for Hillary, I think he said the same thing about Romney in 2012.

Yes, I think he wrote a similar piece about Romney years ago

 

[Ratts of Tobruk]

5 including yours
The clique does stick together

So you can't explain what might be wrong with it either? I only know ralphmalph and swingdog and don't interact with either of them regularly at all. So your reference to "The clique" is just more #PlayTheVictim crap.

 

[GWBogan]

Lol I don't care who wins, why should I? I'm not American, both front runners are s**t candidates in different ways. I wouldn't support either candidate or party if someone put a gun to my head. Now the Johnson, I'd be tugging and pulling it to win if I was American.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Unfortunately, it's a bit like the least worst option.....On the one hand Syphilis, on the other, Gonorrhea.

 

[coerced]

So much bullshit. The right are the reason why we have the term rat*******. They are the experts at it.

Didn't you say you were once right wing? Does this mean you had sex with rats?

 

[coerced]

Sure, but rigged implies it's somehow morally suspect. It's no more rigged than an AFL team choosing one player over another in the draft.

In this election what was once thought of as the normal process of political parties goes to the heart of the debate, looks poisonous and is the reason why Trump is popular.

 

[coerced]

Hopefully he extracts a decent deal for doing so

Lol as if he'll get it.

Clintons will be paying back the donor class ASAP when they are in power.

 

[coerced]

Given GWBogan's post has a ream of likes

haaaaaaaa.

Didn't you tell pjcrows off for predicting a Libs win? Where do we stand now? You're such a sad clown.

 

[Fire]

So according to Michael Moore, Trump will win.....

1. 3. The Hillary Problem. Can we speak honestly, just among ourselves? And before we do, let me state, I actually like Hillary - a lot - and I think she has been given a bad rap she doesn’t deserve. But her vote for the Iraq War made me promise her that I would never vote for her again. To date, I haven’t broken that promise. For the sake of preventing a proto-fascist from becoming our commander-in-chief, I’m breaking that promise. I sadly believe Clinton will find a way to get us in some kind of military action. She’s a hawk, to the right of Obama. But Trump’s psycho finger will be on The Button, and that is that. Done and done.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/5-reasons-why-trump-will-_b_11156794.html

The problem with the US is that they always vote for the lesser devil. Then wonder why they always get devils.

The concept of a third party option is so alien no one ever even considers it.

No matter who wins in November, they will be lead down the toilet. But as always, you get the leader you deserve.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-putin-yes-it-s-really-a-thing

 

[JackNah_8]

No surprise that someone resigned over the Bernie email scandal lol

 

[Ratts of Tobruk]

haaaaaaaa.

Didn't you tell pjcrows off for predicting a Libs win? Where do we stand now? You're such a sad clown.

There is zero worth to this post and once again your analysis is amiss. Were you just fishing for a like from PJ?

 

[Happy Mastenator]

 

[JoseMourinho]

And their owner, Tampa Bay Times has endorsed Hillary Clinton

 

[GWBogan]

And their owner, Tampa Bay Times has endorsed Hillary Clinton

Regardless of endorsements, they're not wrong with regards to Trump lying more than other candidates. Other fact checkers say the exact same thing. But hey... the truth doesn't win votes, it's what the voters want to hear that wins votes.

 

[JoseMourinho]

Regardless of endorsements, they're not wrong with regards to Trump lying more than other candidates. Other fact checkers say the exact same thing. But hey... the truth doesn't win votes, it's what the voters want to hear that wins votes.

Well considering the DNC have been actively influencing Media Outlets, I wouldn't be surprised if certain justifications were made to make certain statements look more false and other candidates look truthful. I wouldn't be surprised if certain statements haven't been "fact-checked" at all.

Kind of like how Fox News does it aswell. (Of course, the RNC are no better).

I actually enjoy all this corruption coming to light.

 

[coerced]

There is zero worth to this post and once again your analysis is amiss. Were you just fishing for a like from PJ?

Unlike you, I don't see likes as validation.

 

[Ratts of Tobruk]

Well considering the DNC have been actively influencing Media Outlets, I wouldn't be surprised if certain justifications were made to make certain statements look more false and other candidates look truthful. I wouldn't be surprised if certain statements haven't been "fact-checked" at all.

Kind of like how Fox News does it aswell. (Of course, the RNC are no better).

I actually enjoy all this corruption coming to light.

That comment is based off the email with a journo asking the DNC to check an article?

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Well considering the DNC have been actively influencing Media Outlets, I wouldn't be surprised if certain justifications were made to make certain statements look more false and other candidates look truthful. I wouldn't be surprised if certain statements haven't been "fact-checked" at all.

Kind of like how Fox News does it aswell. (Of course, the RNC are no better).

I actually enjoy all this corruption coming to light.

You think the RNC hasn't been actively trying to do the same? I love how a major news organisation in Fox can be blatantly partisan, but any media organisation in the center is seen as lefty because the right is so far right.

Given that you can go to the politifact website and see what they've fact checked...

 

[JoseMourinho]

You think the RNC hasn't been actively trying to do the same? I love how a major news organisation in Fox can be blatantly partisan, but any media organisation in the center is seen as lefty because the right is so far right.

As I said, Fox News does it and the RNC probably do it too.

However, we're talking about Politifact which is in the DNC's camp.

 

[coerced]

LOL.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

As I said, Fox News does it and the RNC probably do it too.

However, we're talking about Politifact which is in the DNC's camp.

I was in process of editing my post when you replied here.

You do realise you can go to the politiact website and check their claims, this isn't hidden. If yuo watch with an impartial view (i recognise i have a bias), is this finding really difficult to believe though, RNC members spout weird/lying s**t a lot more than DNC members, the numbers support this. Or do you think both lie at a similar rate?

 

[JoseMourinho]

I was in process of editing my post when you replied here.

You do realise you can go to the politiact website and check their claims, this isn't hidden. If yuo watch with an impartial view (i recognise i have a bias), is this finding really difficult to believe though, RNC members spout weird/lying s**t a lot more than DNC members, the numbers support this. Or do you think both lie at a similar rate?

I'd go with the same rate! After reading the DNC emails, I cannot trust Politifact as an independent source.

 

[Ratts of Tobruk]

I'd go with the same rate! After reading the DNC emails, I cannot trust Politifact as an independent source.

Can you expand on this? As I asked you before, I was only aware that there was one email from a journo, but what is the accusation re:emails otherwise?