Under 19.5 Premier Division

Remove this Banner Ad

D
slickballuser said:
Antovski has played the 2 games vs Marby already anyway.
Click to expand...

Don't think Curmi has played any against Marby.

Will be interesting to see how Marby deal with the bigger bodies. Marby's midfield is pretty small but will be curious as to wheather there run and carry will be too good for Keilor, especially on a bigger ground with more space to run into!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

ZingerAbed said:
Did Marby have some players out? I see Tonkich played seniors for Keilor... do Marby bring anyone back in or will Keilor be too strong?
Click to expand...

On the website it reads Dex Brumby didn't play! I have heard played in the development league for Williamstown last year in the VFL
 
Wo
ZingerAbed said:
An interesting final round, with Aberfeldie and Strathmore both trying to grab onto that 4th spot.

makes it?
Click to expand...
Would have to say abers even if they lose to marby strathmore would have to beat west coburg. But maybe west coburg would prefer to play strathmore first round on the finals and then throw the game. Thoughts ???
 
I have heard that EDS have around 15 players that would be walk up starters to their team that have not played for most of or not at all this season. That certainly makes it hard to win.
 
Crunchtime20 said:
Wo

Would have to say abers even if they lose to marby strathmore would have to beat west coburg. But maybe west coburg would prefer to play strathmore first round on the finals and then throw the game. Thoughts ???
Click to expand...

I agree, West Coburg would probably rather play Strathmore than Abers week one of finals, not sure they will throw the game though, will certainly be an interesting final round.

Just on the EDS Comment, Yes they have had players out but so have other clubs, really just tests the depth and the depth of EDS is showing. I also think 15 is an over exaggeration but am happy to be proven wrong if you can name them.
 
ZingerAbed said:
I agree, West Coburg would probably rather play Strathmore than Abers week one of finals, not sure they will throw the game though, will certainly be an interesting final round.

Just on the EDS Comment, Yes they have had players out but so have other clubs, really just tests the depth and the depth of EDS is showing. I also think 15 is an over exaggeration but am happy to be proven wrong if you can name them.
Click to expand...
Yes 15 is a bit exaggerated but it includes those at Calder and Jets.
 
ZingerAbed said:
They definitely didn't.
Tips for next weeks Finals?
Marby Vs Keilor
West coburg Vs Abers
Click to expand...
After looking at yesterday's results and if that was the best team Keilor can put on the ground being pushed by EDS for all of except 15 minutes Marby should win that one. Marby need to be able to run and have pace. Stop Keilor from being able to spread it wide to their wings on the rebound.

WC vs Abers is going to be interesting. WC might just get them.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Newatthis said:
After looking at yesterday's results and if that was the best team Keilor can put on the ground being pushed by EDS for all of except 15 minutes Marby should win that one. Marby need to be able to run and have pace. Stop Keilor from being able to spread it wide to their wings on the rebound.

WC vs Abers is going to be interesting. WC might just get them.
Click to expand...

Abers were in the game for a long time against Marby and they were really dominant across the ground for the whole second quarter without reward. Could have easily rolled them on Saturday. If Abers get past WC I would be a little nervous as they love September footy and know how to win on the big stage. Obviously have to win the first week of finals first, but momentum can be a big thing.
 
I know Marby sit on top of the ladder but Keilor are Underfeated since Round 7.
Abers are a massive chance especially if their reserves lose first week of finals.
 
ZingerAbed said:
I know Marby sit on top of the ladder but Keilor are Underfeated since Round 7.
Abers are a massive chance especially if their reserves lose first week of finals.
Click to expand...

Would be a typical Aberfeldie thing to do. Boot out 4-5 poor kids who have battled away all year for the 19s for 4-5 'better' players.
Good to see some things never change at the big clubs.

Anyway, I think Keilor are the team to beat but come 12pm Saturday we'll have a much better idea of who has one hand on the cup.
 
slickballuser said:
Would be a typical Aberfeldie thing to do. Boot out 4-5 poor kids who have battled away all year for the 19s for 4-5 'better' players.
Good to see some things never change at the big clubs.

Anyway, I think Keilor are the team to beat but come 12pm Saturday we'll have a much better idea of who has one hand on the cup.
Click to expand...

First of all they only do that if those boys have contributed to the team throughout the year. Second of all they will not be dropping any of those 4-5 back as they wouldn't do that to all the other boys. And third, they can't drop back because they have over qualified.

You potted Abers without even knowing the truth. Good person you are.
 
Passionateman said:
First of all they only do that if those boys have contributed to the team throughout the year. Second of all they will not be dropping any of those 4-5 back as they wouldn't do that to all the other boys. And third, they can't drop back because they have over qualified.

You potted Abers without even knowing the truth. Good person you are.
Click to expand...

History speaks for itself. Just ask the 3-4 players that missed out on the 2013 GF for Tippa and Co at senior level.
 
Passionateman said:
First of all they only do that if those boys have contributed to the team throughout the year. Second of all they will not be dropping any of those 4-5 back as they wouldn't do that to all the other boys. And third, they can't drop back because they have over qualified.

You potted Abers without even knowing the truth. Good person you are.
Click to expand...
That's not true.
Anyone who qualifies to play 19's can regardless of how many games they played so Abers could play Berry, Williamson, Dench, stone, Simpson in the 19's.
 
EDFL knowitall said:
That's not true.
Anyone who qualifies to play 19's can regardless of how many games they played so Abers could play Berry, Williamson, Dench, stone, Simpson in the 19's.
Click to expand...

Am I wrong? If reserves aren't in finals with 19s they cannot go down as they have over qualified. That was the context in which we were discussing. If reserves are playing the boys will be playing there.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0361.PNG
    IMG_0361.PNG
    80.4 KB · Views: 19
Also I have a question for all on this forum. If you have players playing at higher levels, shouldn't we reward them for coming back to their local club to play? And I don't mean qualifying them by doing dodgies. I mean they have played 5-6 matches and have qualified on their own merit. Why would you penalise these players by not allowing them to play? I understand that some players who have been there most of the year will be upset missing out, but with success isn't there always disappointment? I would prefer to reward players who go on to higher levels, rather than penalise them. What's your thoughts?
 
Passionateman said:
Also I have a question for all on this forum. If you have players playing at higher levels, shouldn't we reward them for coming back to their local club to play? And I don't mean qualifying them by doing dodgies. I mean they have played 5-6 matches and have qualified on their own merit. Why would you penalise these players by not allowing them to play? I understand that some players who have been there most of the year will be upset missing out, but with success isn't there always disappointment? I would prefer to reward players who go on to higher levels, rather than penalise them. What's your thoughts?
Click to expand...

There is some Merritt to you comment but on the other hand if you are trying to build quality and depth from your unders then the quickest way to loose them is not to reward the players that have got you to the finals and play guys from out side. At that level it need to be a about development and retention of players .Teams need home grown 1 pointers not over priced 5 pointers
 
Passionateman said:
Am I wrong? If reserves aren't in finals with 19s they cannot go down as they have over qualified. That was the context in which we were discussing. If reserves are playing the boys will be playing there.
Click to expand...
That only relates to seniors and reserves.
Trembath played the whole season for Glenroy seniors but was able to play 19's finals. Sinclair from Hillside was the same. But you can't play reserves if you have played more senior games regardless of your age
 
EDFL knowitall said:
That only relates to seniors and reserves.
Trembath played the whole season for Glenroy seniors but was able to play 19's finals. Sinclair from Hillside was the same. But you can't play reserves if you have played more senior games regardless of your age
Click to expand...

Where in the by-laws does it say you can do that? I have looked at them closely and from what I gather... because the 19s is open age too you can't drop down from the reserves if you have played more games in the reserves (meaning reserves are out of finals). These boys can play 19s if the reserves and seniors are in finals... is that the case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
  • Sticky
EDFL Premier Discussion 2024
40 41 42 43 44
Replies
1K
Views
114K
bangfrom50
B
L
  • Locked
EDFL Premier Discussion 2023
129 130 131 132 133
Replies
3K
Views
378K
Downtroden
D

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top