I'm confused
The hole in the c ring of the pentagon was caused by what ?
A cockpit?
Landing gear?
But the 9/11 commission report said all this disintegrated within the building
So was it the nose?
Kinetic Energy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm confused
The hole in the c ring of the pentagon was caused by what ?
A cockpit?
Landing gear?
But the 9/11 commission report said all this disintegrated within the building
So was it the nose?
It won't its the same crap that got released a year ago.
Which is like Einsteins theory being shot down by an Supermarket Manager.
As someone pointed out earlier , people on this thread really don't understand physics.
Its nothing to be ashamed of , you don't learn this stuff until year 11.
Not if Einstein was right.Which is pretty embarrassing when NIST is supposedly Einstein ... lmao.
Yer it's like saying there is no problem with 2.28 seconds of resistance free collapse, at free fall.
Nothing slowing down gravity ... and this is excepted as plausible ... That a 47 story building can fall for 2.28 seconds at free fall symmetrically...
Yep nothing to see here.
Everything must have magically been removed from below before the collapse started ...The exterior magically and methodically disconnected from the interior so it could keep standing whilst approximently 12 stories inside was removed to make way for free fall.
Amazing
Do you know anything about collapse of materials under compression?
Compression is pretty much resistance right? With out resistance compression is not needed.
Do you know anything about collapse of materials under compression?
Maybe this will help.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_critical_load
I read they'd caught up on their audits and now only have just under a billion unaccounted for?The idiots you speak of are the same idiots who are still yet to account for 2.3 trillion dollars in military spending.
Refer from 3:40
If you think that NIST doesn't back flip than you are being dishonest.
Yer it's like saying there is no problem with 2.28 seconds of resistance free collapse, at free fall.
Nothing slowing down gravity ... and this is excepted as plausible ... That a 47 story building can fall for 2.28 seconds at free fall symmetrically...
Yep nothing to see here.
Everything must have magically been removed from below before the collapse started ...The exterior magically and methodically disconnected from the interior so it could keep standing whilst approximently 12 stories inside was removed to make way for free fall.
Amazing
Gravity is not a speed. You cant "slow down" a force.
Too busy right now to dish up the evidence (but I will as soon as I get the chance) but Chandler has been proven to be soundly misguided in his analysis and in his interpretation of the NIST findings.
Of course, you dont believe this, and nor will you pay any attention to the evidence I will put forward, but I'll do it anyway...
Gravity is not a speed. You cant "slow down" a force.
Still haven't bothered to watch the David chandler video after almost 12 months... trollHe still hasn't bothered to look at anything I've shown him.... still trumpeting the tired old debunked nonsense...
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
If you can slow it down it must have a speed or velocity.WTF??? Where did I say it was a speed??? You can't slow down gravity? I'm worried about the roof above me now.
If you can slow it down it must have a speed or velocity.
Gravity does not have a velocity.
So there was nothing resisting the acceleration of gravity
Because IT ACCELERATED AT FREE FALL for 2.28 seconds ....How do you know?
If you can slow it down it must have a speed or velocity.
Gravity does not have a velocity.
What's Kinetic Energy got to do with a hole being punched in the c ring of the Pentagon?Kinetic Energy?
What's Kinetic Energy got to do with a hole being punched in the c ring of the Pentagon?