Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 4 (cont in pt 5)

[Maggie5]

This is a curious development, any rational explanations?

Yep, #fakenews!
Do a Google search and you will find her response.

 

[Ripper]

Yep, #fakenews!
Do a Google search and you will find her response.

Do you have a link?

This is what I get.

 

[Ripper]

Here is the Rice Email and Grassley letter. Bizarre!

 

[Happy Mastenator]

This is a curious development, any rational explanations?

Haven't watched, but is that the clip where he selectively reads only part of the email?

They are *en clowns.

 

[Ripper]

Haven't watched, but is that the clip where he selectively reads only part of the email?

They are ****en clowns.

Maybe you should , and read Grassleys letter and questions at the same time before calling anyone clowns.
I posted the whole thing above.

 

[FireKrakouer]

Incorrect.
Trolling is to deliberately attempt to upset someone, based on a view you don't legitimately hold.

It's also commonly used as an excuse by people, when they find that a position they have legitimately been pushing is incorrect.

This seems to come down to a difference in opinion re: the definition of "troll". I don't think it's about deliberately upsetting people. The MSM (largely managed by older people with no understanding of internet culture) consider trolling and bullying to be synonymous.

 

[Maggie5]

Here is the Rice Email and Grassley letter. Bizarre!

Don't need to see as am familiar with it all including her response which you are avoiding.
Don't waste any more time, not interested.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Maybe you should , and read Grassleys letter and questions at the same time before calling anyone clowns.
I posted the whole thing above.

Just read it. His letter is bullshit. It's purely done to throw s**t.

He will keep the response that states the obvious very quiet but you and the other trumpers will take this letter as another sign.

It's rubbish

 

[Ripper]

Don't need to see as am familiar with it all including her response which you are avoiding.
Don't waste any more time, not interested.

I cannot seem to find her response, Can you post a link please as you have obviously seen it.

 

[GreyCrow]

Because she won't STFU and disappear.

Apart from her book can you tell me all the shows she has been on.

 

[GreyCrow]

Trump blows the budget

Making America Broke Again

 

[Maggie5]

I cannot seem to find her response, Can you post a link please as you have obviously seen it.

Will do.

 

[FireKrakouer]

Just as I predicted, this is an exact play-by-play of the presidential campaign.

More DNC corruption keeps drip-drip-dripping out in the lead up to the midterms. Trump (and those loyal to him) are truly underestimated, yet again.

Meanwhile, the anti-Trumpers:

 

[Ripper]

Just read it. His letter is bullshit. It's purely done to throw s**t.

He will keep the response that states the obvious very quiet but you and the other trumpers will take this letter as another sign.

It's rubbish

You can't say that, He is Chairman of the Senate oversight committee on the Judiciary. They have a job to do.

 

[Ripper]

Speaking of oversight Committees , Here is the Latest on the Shiff Memo.

 

[Ripper]

Great explanation by Former federal prosecutor Joe diGenova on the status of the Shiff Memo.


https://audioboom.com/channel/mornings-on-the-mall

 

[GreyCrow]

Just as I predicted, this is an exact play-by-play of the presidential campaign.

More DNC corruption keeps drip-drip-dripping out in the lead up to the midterms. Trump (and those loyal to him) are truly underestimated, yet again.

Meanwhile, the anti-Trumpers:


View attachment 459477

Thats the Republicans looking for the evidence

 

[FireKrakouer]

This thread, post Ripper spreading red pills:

 

[Maggie5]

Do you have a link?

This is what I get.

Speaking of oversight Committees , Here is the Latest on the Shiff Memo.

Aren't they the same concerns they had with the Nunes memo? Trump didn't have a problem releasing that.

You are just confirming that Trump has something to hide and just wants one memo out there.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Maybe you should , and read Grassleys letter and questions at the same time before calling anyone clowns.
I posted the whole thing above.

Ripper do you even read them? Or do you just make your own already biased conclusions? The only thing bizzare is how you can come to the random conclusions you have. It's mind boggling.

 

[Ripper]

Aren't they the same concerns they had with the Nunes memo? Trump didn't have a problem releasing that.

You are just confirming that Trump has something to hide and just wants one memo out there.

No one is saying that it was improper to send it to herself.
People are finding it very odd that She would send the Email to herself two weeks later on the very day of the inauguration.

Some are saying that She held out thinking Trump wouldn't get inaugurated.

This is very Odd.

P.S. I reckon all the info should be released.

 

[Maggie5]

No one is saying that it was improper to send it to herself.
People are finding it very odd that She would send the Email to herself two weeks later on the very day of the inauguration.

Some are saying that She held out thinking Trump wouldn't get inaugurated.

This is very Odd.

For mine another 'nothing burger' move on, nothing to see here.

What about the other part of my post?

 

[Ripper]

For mine another 'nothing burger' move on, nothing to see here.

What about the other part of my post?

Sorry, I must have been editing while you were posting.

P.S. I reckon all the info should be released.

 

[Lebbo73]

Yep, people who admit when they get things wrong can have credibility. People who pretend they are never wrong have less credibility, because everyone knows that everyone makes mistakes sometimes. Another life lesson for you. I'm glad we are finally getting something productive out of your constant repetition of this old argument. No-one else is, though.

Are you calling yourself out Ratts?

 

[PurpleEyes]

For mine another 'nothing burger' move on, nothing to see here.

What about the other part of my post?

Maybe if Rice had have sent that Email shortly after the meeting, but to do it on the 20th (over 2 weeks later) smells very fishy. It's natural to suspect that they have done this to try to assist Obama's administrations political narrative in some way.

The opening paragraph of the letter to Rice is important to remember.
"The Senate Judiciary Committee has a constitutional duty to conduct oversight of the FBI and the broader Department of Justice. Part of that duty involves ensuring that law enforcement efforts are conducted without improper political influence."

So even the act of creating a record by memorializing the meeting, two weeks after the event is very suspicious and I would imagine, is not normal practice, without improper political influence. It is far from a nothing burger, even if it was an isolated event, but in the context of all the drips we are learning about, it stinks.