Kirk Cousins is a top 15 quarterback. The Browns need a quarterback. They are going to explore every avenue available to help solve the 20 year quarterback problem. By signing cousins it would give them more freedom with the number 1 pick. Having already solved the QB problem it would free them up to take BPA (your man crush Saquon), or trade back to a team that needs a QB.
Now I'm operating under the assumption that Cousins doesn't want to come to Cleveland. In that case we are still in desperate need of a quarterback. Luckily this is a good quarterback class, and we have the top pick. Im not sure why this is so hard to wrap your head around.
While you may be happy for my team to take a running back, put their feet up and say to the rest of the NFL "hey, let us know which QB is going to be the face of our franchise for the next 15 years", I'm not ok with that. While a love Saquon, a top 15 QB is so much more valuable than a top 5 RB.
Because this is an unusually deep class. However, just because there is not a consensus QB1 doesn't mean CLEVELAND won't have a QB1 by April. In fact it's a certainty that they will know the one QB that they want to be the face of their franchise for the next decade and a half after the combine, pro days and interviews. And you want Cleveland to pass on him to draft a RB, that may still be there at 4. Where do we find them.
What do you mean by generational? There have been 2 running backs on par with Barkley in the last 3 drafts.
You'd really take him? Ok, someone let the Titans and Bucs know that they should have taken Gurley over Mariota and Winston. Someone let the Eagles know they should have taken Zeke over Wentz.
I don't want to make it seem like I don't rate Barkley. If he's there at 4 I'd be happy to have him (would rather Minkah but would not be upset at all). If we land Cousins I'd be thrilled to grab both. But we're not taking him 1.
Now I'm operating under the assumption that Cousins doesn't want to come to Cleveland. In that case we are still in desperate need of a quarterback. Luckily this is a good quarterback class, and we have the top pick. Im not sure why this is so hard to wrap your head around.
While you may be happy for my team to take a running back, put their feet up and say to the rest of the NFL "hey, let us know which QB is going to be the face of our franchise for the next 15 years", I'm not ok with that. While a love Saquon, a top 15 QB is so much more valuable than a top 5 RB.
Maybe Is it because the top qbs this year perhaps arent clear cut franchise qbs? Maybe this year doesnt have a number 1 qb worthy of the spot. If their was a clear franchise qb this year...why isnt even close to consensus by now? Why are 4! Qbs still being floated as pick 1?
Because this is an unusually deep class. However, just because there is not a consensus QB1 doesn't mean CLEVELAND won't have a QB1 by April. In fact it's a certainty that they will know the one QB that they want to be the face of their franchise for the next decade and a half after the combine, pro days and interviews. And you want Cleveland to pass on him to draft a RB, that may still be there at 4. Where do we find them.
If you don't thin there is a franchise Quarterback in the draft, why would you be ok spending the 4th pick on one.THE talent is GOOD this year ...but i think its a step below the franchise qbs we keep hearing about.
If the pick is qb at 1 then thats fine good luck to Cleveland i hope hes a success. My personal view is there is a generational player available at running back. Id take him.
What do you mean by generational? There have been 2 running backs on par with Barkley in the last 3 drafts.
You'd really take him? Ok, someone let the Titans and Bucs know that they should have taken Gurley over Mariota and Winston. Someone let the Eagles know they should have taken Zeke over Wentz.
I don't want to make it seem like I don't rate Barkley. If he's there at 4 I'd be happy to have him (would rather Minkah but would not be upset at all). If we land Cousins I'd be thrilled to grab both. But we're not taking him 1.
Last edited: