Dewnior
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 22, 2007
- 9,657
- 17,291
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Did Scott duck the question?
I'm also predicting that he'll be doing a lot more bending at the knees when they come up against us
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Did Scott duck the question?
hopefully he will be on his knees, along with his sideI'm also predicting that he'll be doing a lot more bending at the knees when they come up against us
Clarko called out Puopolo tooCan't believe puopolo just ducked for that free kick...
Its his 1 and only go to moveIt doesn’t get illustrated better than this.
I would suggest that any argument that deluded Geelong supporters make is very quickly quelled when you post this gif of Joel showing how vertically challenged he becomes when a hand gets placed on his arm.
But yet you believe it when Selwood does it mutiple times in a game and thousands of times over his career ?Can't believe puopolo just ducked for that free kick...
Did you see the Puopolo high contact free kick when we were kicking to the city end today? (I think it was the last quarter).
What do people think of the Richmond players' response?
Puopolo is short... He angles his body low... Is it ducking? Is it different from the Selwood shoulder shrug where the tackle is initially legal but is made to go high when the arm is lifted?
Slightly different scenarios for mine, but would also understand if the umpire called play on.
Expect some fines for the ensuing melee!
Poppy is not that much shorter than sellers. It's a poor argument to base onDid you see the Puopolo high contact free kick when we were kicking to the city end today? (I think it was the last quarter).
What do people think of the Richmond players' response?
Puopolo is short... He angles his body low... Is it ducking? Is it different from the Selwood shoulder shrug where the tackle is initially legal but is made to go high when the arm is lifted?
Slightly different scenarios for mine, but would also understand if the umpire called play on.
Expect some fines for the ensuing melee!
I have no issues with the technique, just the hypocritical application of the rule, one for sellers, and one for the restBut yet you believe it when Selwood does it mutiple times in a game and thousands of times over his career ?
You Geelong supporters are a strange breed.
He is at the moment, the hypocrisy is when a hawthorn member (I assume you've paid up for you and your 3 dogs) like yourself demands Selwood's tackle evasion to be deemed play on, yet Puopolo can drop to his knees and it be called high contact.so you'd like Selwood to get umpired the same as everyone else?
If that's your response then I'll take it as you agreeing with me that all hawk supporters are hypocritical.
He gets more leniency than most, the gets a free pass from commentators and unlike you I can admit when one of my clubs players draws a high contact free.He is at the moment, the hypocrisy is when a hawthorn member (I assume you've paid up for you and your 3 dogs) like yourself demands Selwood's tackle evasion to be deemed play on, yet Puopolo can drop to his knees and it be called high contact.
Stop talking s**t you deluded muppet.*He is at the moment, the hypocrisy is when a hawthorn member (I assume you've paid up for you and your 3 dogs) like yourself demands Selwood's tackle evasion to be deemed play on, yet Puopolo can drop to his knees and it be called high contact.
It was my attempt at being nice.why are you using muppet as an insult?
I'll turn you into me.liar