Tom Boyd 'not in the best 22', admits skipper

[Mofra]

Good for you.

I've read all your comments.

You said he doesn't deserve the money.

I'm done. You're not worth the time.

 

[Mofra]

View attachment 482444

Sadly, some people are just too stupid for rational discussion.

 

[bungalow_bill]

Has no motivation to work hard - has a flag,millions of $,why bother?

 

[Dazb86]

Is he a 1 million dollar a year player? Absolutely not.

Has his contract been justified? Yes. He could peel oranges for the womens side from now on and I'd think it was justified.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

You're not worth the time.

45 years of L'Oreal commercials suggest otherwise.

Sadly, some people are just too stupid for rational discussion.

So snippy.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Is he a 1 million dollar a year player? Absolutely not.

Well, he is. That's what he gets paid. My question is whether that's been justified by his overall performance.

Has his contract been justified? Yes. He could peel oranges for the womens side from now on and I'd think it was justified.

Because Boyd = flag.

 

[DelRe]

I said Boyd may well have been worth the risk at the time the Bulldogs recruited him. I can understand the Bulldogs' thinking.

This is exactly the OPs question. The question isn’t how much would I pay for each game he played after the event.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

This is exactly the OPs question.

So what?

The question isn’t how much would I pay for each game he played after the event.

This is your argument now?

Someone asked another question earlier so you can't countenance a different one?

 

[DelRe]

So what?

This is your argument now?

Someone asked another question earlier so you can't countenance a different one?

The general objective is to answer the thread question isn’t it? Not sure what you mean by your second comment.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

The general objective is to answer the thread question isn’t it?

I am not limited by it.

Not sure what you mean by your second comment.

You don't know what countenance means? That's OK.

I'll rephrase it: Someone asked another question earlier so you can't consider a different one?

 

[DelRe]

I am not limited by it.

You don't know what countenance means? That's OK.

I'll rephrase it: Someone asked another question earlier so you can't consider a different one?

The penny’s just dropped on your username. Have fun.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

The penny’s just dropped on your username. Have fun.

I will, thanks.

 

[ThirdLegUp]

Because Boyd = flag.

Correct.

/end thread

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Correct.

/end thread

So clever. Checkmate.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Sweet Jesus' assumption is that everyone who contributed to the flag should be paid the same. So he either believes that the water boy's on the day are incredibly underpaid, or he is a communist.

You left out a 3rd option:

3) Not the full quid.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

You left out a 3rd option:

3) Not the full quid.

Too late, Snakey. You already rolled over.

You're like a little kid who gets to the top of the water slide but chickens out and has to walk all the way back down past the other kids.

Now the water slide is closed. You missed your turn.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Too late, Snakey. You already rolled over.

You're like a little kid who gets to the top of the water slide but chickens out and has to walk all the way back down past the other kids.

Now the water slide is closed. You missed your turn.

You're flyin champ.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Your flyin champ.

The water slide is closed, Snakey.

 

[Dogs till i die]

Should of cut out the middle man and just paid the umps

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Maybe we should have.....might have got a decent run from them on the day . Lucky we didn't need them the week before.

 

[Colonial]

Maybe we should have.....might have got a decent run from them on the day . Lucky we didn't need them the week before.

Thats cute you think so.

Oh well onwards and upwoods. For some.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

[Pykie]

In hindsight with what we know now. Absolutely I, and every Dogs supporter would do the deal 100/100.

In terms of the contract, it is a bit of an issue. By all reports heavily frontloaded so hoping he’s ‘only’ on around 700k into the future.

I think the front loading is a myth.

He was the 4th highest paid player in the AFL last year.

 

[Bulldog Joe]

I'm not putting any spin on it. That's what you're doing.

Boyd's overall performance has not justified his pay packet. It's that simple. Where's the spin?

I did suggest there is a wider context, where the value has been achieved. Why don't you respond to my point, or do you only exist in silo existence?

 

[Sweet Jesus]

I did suggest there is a wider context, where the value has been achieved. Why don't you respond to my point, or do you only exist in silo existence?

You got me. I only exist in silo existence. The jig is up.

What was your point?

I saw only a tangent, which I ignored.

 

[Bulldog Joe]

You got me. I only exist in silo existence. The jig is up.

What was your point?

I saw only a tangent, which I ignored.

That is ok. You clearly are not interested in the wider context of what the Football Club has achieved since the signing of Tom Boyd.

 

[Brad Goodman]

Dude, 65 posts in the last three hours in this thread. You must have something better to do.