Teams 2019 Rate My Pre-Season Team

[Socrates2]

Roast or Toast me because I've been roasting!

 

[01110]

Looks very good although not having Libba and Collins could be a problem if they score well.

Can go libba in for butters with the money left over


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[INSECURIOUS]

Newbie here, any comments appreciated, thanks.

 

[Socrates2]

View attachment 636610
Thoughts? Pretty set with this team, maybe might add Smith for Worpel by moving Moore to FWD. What do you guys think?

Looks solid although too many midprice imo

 

[JRyan23]

Newbie here, any comments appreciated, thanks.

View attachment 636621

Too many risks imo, no need to have all 3 premo defenders, i would have one, and you need Williams. VandenBerg and McCarthy are big risks i would probably downgrade one, and upgrade one of your 4 mid price mids. Downgrade Cousins

 

[Requiem]

Newbie here, any comments appreciated, thanks.

View attachment 636621

Your ruck division is going to get annihilated, beef it up.

 

[Socrates2]

I

Newbie here, any comments appreciated, thanks.

View attachment 636621

I like it, maybe get rid of vandenberg and McCarthy for a rookie and other.

 

[Gavin Excell]

Liberatore a tough question

 

[JRyan23]

Looks solid although too many midprice imo

I only have 5, Moore is practically a rookie at that price imo. Crouch and Libba offer great scoring potential at a moderate price, much better than rookies. I would rather have BCrouch and Libba than say a Cogs and a rookie. You need a mid pricer at f4 imo and Worpel (especially with no Mitchell) will win a lot of the ball. Williams is a lock in every team

 

[Hai_Newman]

Roast or Toast me because I've been roasting!
View attachment 636612View attachment 636615

Westhoff is s**t, why cause his beard is s**t and just cause.
I dont like Bines he's s**t too,
Lobb is uber cool and s**t.
I rate it cause its the s**t..
TheBeardAmigos amidoingitrite?

 

[LegendLewis]

Your ruck division is going to get annihilated, beef it up.

The group think on Grundy and Gawn being must haves is out of control.
Goldy averaged 110 odd after a s**t start to the year and Lycett didn't do too badly sharing the ruck.
For $330,000 less money you get maybe 60 to 80 less points per week and as long as you have some other good captain choices that $330,000 or more if you don't choose lycett can net you ALOT more than 60 to 80 points.
I will declare it! The Gawndy is a trap!
Try to do a team without those 2 (yes 2, out of 30) players.

 

[Gavin Excell]

Westhoff is s**t, why cause his beard is s**t and just cause.
I dont like Bines he's s**t too,
Lobb is uber cool and s**t.
I rate it cause its the s**t..

Vital analysis

 

[Socrates2]

I only have 5, Moore is practically a rookie at that price imo. Crouch and Libba offer great scoring potential at a moderate price, much better than rookies. I would rather have BCrouch and Libba than say a Cogs and a rookie. You need a mid pricer at f4 imo and Worpel (especially with no Mitchell) will win a lot of the ball. Williams is a lock in every team

Yes true but Moore won't make as much as a rookie and costs more (no pun intended) From a moneyball point of view, midpricers aren't going to make as much and require a trade.

 

[Gavin Excell]

The group think on Grundy and Gawn being must haves is out of control.
Goldy averaged 110 odd after a s**t start to the year and Lycett didn't do too badly sharing the ruck.
For $330,000 less money you get maybe 60 to 80 less points per week and as long as you have some other good captain choices that $330,000 or more if you don't choose lycett can net you ALOT more than 60 to 80 points.
I will declare it! The Gawndy is a trap!
Try to do a team without those 2 (yes 2, out of 30) players.

Its to step away from group think that becomes important. Just got to get it right

 

[Requiem]

The group think on Grundy and Gawn being must haves is out of control.
Goldy averaged 110 odd after a s**t start to the year and Lycett didn't do too badly sharing the ruck.
For $330,000 less money you get maybe 60 to 80 less points per week and as long as you have some other good captain choices that $330,000 or more if you don't choose lycett can net you ALOT more than 60 to 80 points.
I will declare it! The Gawndy is a trap!
Try to do a team without those 2 (yes 2, out of 30) players.

I'm not a hard Gawndy proponent, I but think you should probably have 1 of them + Goldstein.

I'd go with Gawn + Goldstein.

 

[Hai_Newman]

Vital analysis

Scrotums 101

 

[LegendLewis]

I'm not a hard Gawndy proponent, I but think you should probably have 1 of them + Goldstein.

I'd go with Gawn + Goldstein.

Try to do a team without both...see what you come up with...

 

[INSECURIOUS]

I

I like it, maybe get rid of vandenberg and McCarthy for a rookie and other.

Nihilistic melts are my friend.

 

[Marlowe]

The group think on Grundy and Gawn being must haves is out of control.
Goldy averaged 110 odd after a s**t start to the year and Lycett didn't do too badly sharing the ruck.
For $330,000 less money you get maybe 60 to 80 less points per week and as long as you have some other good captain choices that $330,000 or more if you don't choose lycett can net you ALOT more than 60 to 80 points.
I will declare it! The Gawndy is a trap!
Try to do a team without those 2 (yes 2, out of 30) players.

If there were any clear alternatives to Grundy and Gawn, maybe I'd feel comfortable going in the cheaper direction. But I don't see any other rucks of note making a case for themselves, and they won't until the season begins. So as I see it, I'd rather start the sure-fire can't-miss options and trade down later than gamble at the start on Westhoff/Nank/Witts/Lobb/Lycett being any good.

Also, if I don't have to think about rucks all year, then that's a win too.

 

[Requiem]

Try to do a team without both...see what you come up with...

I done a few, I'm convinced one (if not both) of them will be top 2, and I don't like the idea of side swapping premo priced rucks.

 

[Socrates2]

Nihilistic melts are my friend.

Whadduya mean?

 

[Pedro]

The group think on Grundy and Gawn being must haves is out of control.
Goldy averaged 110 odd after a s**t start to the year and Lycett didn't do too badly sharing the ruck.
For $330,000 less money you get maybe 60 to 80 less points per week and as long as you have some other good captain choices that $330,000 or more if you don't choose lycett can net you ALOT more than 60 to 80 points.
I will declare it! The Gawndy is a trap!
Try to do a team without those 2 (yes 2, out of 30) players.

2 of the top 3 in total points. Last year apart from Mitchell they both clearly outscored the next best. Great captain options. Its hard not to lock that in (no guarantees of a repeat of course). I've got them both currently but will muck around with different combos to see how it effects the rest of my team. I doubt I'll convince myself not to start them

 

[JRyan23]

Yes true but Moore won't make as much as a rookie and costs more (no pun intended) From a moneyball point of view, midpricers aren't going to make as much and require a trade.

But they score much more, Collins (who i see in your team) is 50k less, Moore imo will be able to score much higher and has a higher ceiling due to not having a direct man all the time compared to Collins. A rookie is gonna require trade as well....

 

[LegendLewis]

If there were any clear alternatives to Grundy and Gawn, maybe I'd feel comfortable going in the cheaper direction. But I don't see any other rucks of note making a case for themselves, and they won't until the season begins. So as I see it, I'd rather start the sure-fire can't-miss options and trade down later than gamble at the start on Westhoff/Nank/Witts/Lobb/Lycett being any good.

Also, if I don't have to think about rucks all year, then that's a win too.

I done a few, I convinced one (if not both) of them will be top 2, and I don't like the idea of side swapping premo priced rucks.

I do actually think there are a few alternatives and my point remains in that you are trying to get the top two scorers in a two position race (rucks) and if you manage to get the third and fourth in that position who cares, especially if you start with 2 or 3 or more keepers in other lines. The big picture has 30 positions and if you ignore the top 2 in ruck every other position players move up in rank.

I'm probably going a crap way of explaining but its kinda like...
do you want
1,2,3,12,14, 18, 21, 30, 42, 82,
or
3,4,5,8,11, 16, 20, 26, 34, 45

 

[Pedro]

I've been really late to the party this year and not given my S/C team the attention it deserves. I'm not really happy with it but will probably roll with something similar to this:


Any thoughts gurus??