List Mgmt. Trading pick 3 - Who wants it???

[Maggsy]

So much water to go under the bridge, ie; compensation, FA picks, trades etc etc - but as it currently stands..... With a need to split this pick into multiple picks, Who and what do we deal this pick with?

I personally think GWS / Lions our best bet. (thinking long term, espescially when GWS get a 1st round compo pick for RFA Coniglio)


CURRENT PICKS:

 

[SuperBashBros]

Pick 3 and 28 for picks 12,13 & 14?

 

[radzyb]

Let's not trade down.

For as long as I can remember we have not had a pick higher than 9. Keep 3. Sell the farm to get another in the top 10.

 

[jackster83]

Wouldn't consider trading it unless it gets us Luko.

Bundle up some players with our second round picks if we want more picks in the first round.

 

[The Smith Revolution]

Kicking the can down the road is partly what has got us to this hellhole.

 

[skittlebrew]

With a need to split this pick into multiple picks

Is there...?

 

[Maggsy]

Kicking the can down the road is partly what has got us to this hellhole.

Trading down is what landed Rozee/Butters + Duursma to the scummers too..

 

[kulak]

I expect we will trade for value. If Binuk’s draft points index says the trade is a big win then we will do it.

I expect we will trade if we think the player at 3 is not that much better than the player at 10 in which case why not get two tickets in the lottery instead of just one.

Would be gutted if we were trading out the ability to get Luko / Rankine / Rozee. But we are not.

 

[Cleric]

GWS will need firsts to match an offer on Green.

 

[jackster83]

GWS will need firsts to match an offer on Green.

They've already got two firsts, and will likely get another as compensation for Coniglio.

 

[kulak]

Top 10 from recent drafts:

 

[Crow till I die]

GWS will need firsts to match an offer on Green.

damn shame if we put in a bid on green and then GWS had to use a couple of their 1sts to match which would then bump UP the remaining picks after theirs are used up. Carlton won't get the benefit of our pick being bumped up but we get their 2nd rounder bumped up

 

[Maggsy]

Top 10 from recent drafts:

View attachment 730047

Not sure what the rationale is behind the highlighting? Is it players you think are talented? if so VERY stiff on Rayner, Clark, Mills, Moore. Billings, Vlaustin, Wines and jury still out on a lot of others..

 

[mulz]

If we trade pick 3 or 4 that will be the final straw for me. This pick cant be traded

 

[FR0GGY]

As I said it the other thread it would be silly to trade for 2 later picks, may as-well have just kept 19 and 9 or what ever we land with this year.

 

[mulz]

As I said it the other thread it would be silly to trade for 2 later picks, may as-well have just kept 19 and 9 or what ever we land with this year.

Correct . There was no point in the pick trade if we divvy it up now...just ridiculous

 

[kulak]

Not sure what the rationale is behind the highlighting? Is it players you think are talented? if so VERY stiff on Rayner, Clark, Mills, Moore. Billings, Vlaustin, Wines and jury still out on a lot of others..

Subjective. I think there’s lots of good players you listed but not sure they are stars.

I would be happy with those guys at pick 10+ but a bit sad at pick 3.

Ie keep pick 3 if it means we are drafting a likely star. Otherwise I don’t mind splitting it.

 

[FR0GGY]

Correct . There was no point in the pick trade if we divvy it up now...just ridiculous

Pick a “potential” gun or trade it for a gun, only two options.

 

[Crow till I die]

Correct . There was no point in the pick trade if we divvy it up now...just ridiculous

I would have thought if we had NOT done the pick trade last year and we ended up with pick 9 this year, a fair trade for GWS 2 x 1sts might have been pick 9 and pick 21 for their 2 teens 1sts

 

[DJ75]

If I'm trading pick 3, I want two picks in the top 10. Preferably around pick 6-8 range. Pick 3 is premium and I wouldn't trade down for much below that if at all.

 

[jirkago]

I’m in the trade for 2 firsts and try for another second rounder. all the talk is about the top 2 players and then there is a difference between the others.

If there isn’t a big difference between 3 and 15, why not. Also there isn’t a top SA prospect to go for. I’m sick of losing top talent every year. We should try and get the 3 or 4 SA boys this year. We could get Gould, Stephens, Taheny, Day and maybe Hilder if we play our cards right.

I know it sounds like We are only going SA but I don’t care. We need a complete rebuild and local players don’t leave the Crows.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Peter Wallis]

If you put B.Crouch up for trade you would expect a late first rounder in return. A draft haul of say 3, 15, 21 & 27 is not bad for starters. Speed would be a priority imo.

 

[Crow till I die]

If you put B.Crouch up for trade you would expect a late first rounder in return. A draft haul of say 3, 15, 21 & 27 is not bad for starters. Speed would be a priority imo.

WTF??!!..He is our BEST mid and he is under contract for another year. If we slip down the pecking order next year and finish bottom 6, he will get us a RFA pick straight after our 1st. WHY ON EARTH would we let him go for a bag of chips

 

[Peter Wallis]

WTF??!!..He is our BEST mid and he is under contract for another year. If we slip down the pecking order next year and finish bottom 6, he will get us a RFA pick straight after our 1st. WHY ON EARTH would we let him go for a bag of chips

Fair call. I personally don't see him as worth a top 5 draft pick but given he is under contract I can see why you would hold on to him unless a club offers overs.

 

[AusTerran]

If we trade pick 3 or 4 that will be the final straw for me. This pick cant be traded

The only way I would trade Pick 3 is
Pick 3 + JJ to Melbourne
Pick 2 to Adelaide

One can dream...