Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell * The foster mother has been recommended for charges of pervert the course of justice & interfere with a corpse

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
That charge relates to evidence she gave to the Crime Commission about William’s disappearance from a home in Kendall on the NSW Mid North Coast while the family were on holiday in September 2014.

There's no doubt now then that both the fosters appeared before the NSWCC in relation to William's disappearance, any talk that the charges aren't related is nonsense.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There's no doubt now then that both the fosters appeared before the NSWCC in relation to William's disappearance, any talk that the charges aren't related is nonsense.

So the Daily Telegraph reckons it was no secret that the Foster Mother had been at the NSW Crime Commission about this case.

I heavily speculated on this (see far below) when we first found out the Foster Father had been charged for lying to the NSW Crime Commission about this case.

But now we know, that the Foster mother was only charged for the lying today, as opposed to me speculating that she might have been charged for lying to the NSW Crime Commission pre-11th March 2022, and the charge suppressed.

None of the media reports I've seen today, claim or report when the Foster Mother was taken down to the NSW Crime Commission, but I previously speculated (see below quotes) that it might have been at roughly the same time as the Foster Father (for 2 hours on 11th Nov 2021), and done in a way that they could not corroborate their stories after the first of them was questioned.


'It is no secret that both the foster mother and the foster father have been taken down to the forbidding headquarters of the powerful NSW Crime Commission in Kent St. Both have been charged with giving false or misleading information to the commission.

The commission has wide and coercive powers to force people to give evidence,

The 56-year-old foster mother was issued with a court attendance on Tuesday by NSW Homicide detectives. Her husband was charged with identical offences earlier this year and has pleaded not guilty.'


'The details of what exactly is the evidence provided to the NSW Crime Commission by the foster father which police claim is false and misleading are unavailable.'

So now we know that it wasn't allegedly false evidence provided a long time ago.
The charges are from allegedly false evidence at a 11th November, 2021 NSW Crime Commission questioning.

I wonder if the foster mother was also also questioned by the NSW Crime Commission around or on 11th November, 2021.

Possibly at the exact same time as the foster father, or just before or after, whilst the other party might have been held in a secure room to ensure that the two of them did not corroborate their answers after the first one was possibly questioned.

Or after this 11th November, 2021 questioning of the foster father or both the foster father and foster mother, covert surveillance of their physical or digital communications, provided evidence to NSW Police of one or both of the foster parents lying.

For all we know, the foster mother could have also been charged with lying, and the lying charge(s) is currently suppressed.
 
Last edited:
If Jubelin took their statements originally and it contains the alleged lying, then he likely was called to appear.
Possibly Ch10's Lia Harris and Lia Harris, and Natarsha Belling too?
(Hosts of the Where's William Tyrrell podcasts that included interviews with the fosters)
 
I previously speculated (see below quotes) that it might have been at roughly the same time as the Foster Father (for 2 hours on 11th Nov 2021), and done in a way that they could not corroborate their stories after the first of them was questioned.

Could be but why is she only being charged now?
 
GUILTY!!!

🙄

Seriously, when are all these charges going to be heard and put us out of our misery?


Without agreeing with the first part of your post, can confirm a May 24 court date for FM for this latest charge of lying.

And both foster parents also in court in late April for other charges.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I believe that is correct.
I think you were the source kat1234 of this Dec 2020 death of the FGM (posted in this thread)

Can you provide more info info where you got this date from (if it was you)?

As the only thing I could find was the Daily Mail that announced it in March 2021, but did not say what month she actually died.
Edit: And Ch9


 
We have a thread for listing court dates so as we come across them, feel free to lodge them in here:

 
What a terrible conundrum this is.

I really hope William's own parents are being kept in the loop as much as possible under the circumstances. They must be beside themselves with worry. 😢
 
Magistrate Ross Hudson spoke for three hours before delivering his decision.

More Questions Than Answers
From 8:00

NB: Some of the most significant comments made by Magistrate Hudson were in regards to the testimony from Paul Savage. The Magistrate told the court he disagreed with the defence case that Jubelin would have assumed Savage knew he was being recorded because he was aware of the police surveillance on him.

LH: The Magistrate told the court Mr Savage did not consent to being recorded and maintained that throughout his testimony. He reiterated several times that Jubelin's claims the conversations were time sensitive and had to happen on those particular days were not believable and that on each occasion he spoke with Savage and recorded those conversations, Jubelin dictated the day the time and the nature of the conversations. That someone else could have talked with Savage if Jubelin was concerned his relationship with Savage had deteriorated to the point where Jubelin was concerned for false complaints.

Magistrate Hudson then went on to comment on the pursuit of Savage as a suspect and the questioning of him which was played in court.

He questioned what evidence Mr Jubelin had to suspect Mr Savage telling the ecourt there is no dna, no fingerprints, no witness that can even say they saw William go in to Mr Savage's yard, there are no leads, there's nothing.

He also criticized the five hour interview with Mr Savage in 2017 saying the repeated questions could be quote "seen as offensive" and then told the court Jubelin's inability to make concessions about the way he went in the pursuit of Mr Savage would affect his reliability as a witness. He then went on to say quote "This was above and beyond legality" and "Mr Jubelin made a decision Mr Savage was his man and pursued him as a POI at all costs."

NB: That's a pretty scathing assessment

End 9:57


 
Most accounts through the press have the foster grandmother's death in March 2021. Via the ABC in November.

The three-year-old's foster-grandmother died eight months ago and the car, which once belonged to her, is undergoing forensic examination at a secure facility, with results not expected for several weeks.

 
Most accounts through the press have the foster grandmother's death in March 2021. Via the ABC in November.

The three-year-old's foster-grandmother died eight months ago and the car, which once belonged to her, is undergoing forensic examination at a secure facility, with results not expected for several weeks.

They "believe" it, or they are investigating the possibility? If you believe something you are sure of it.
 
They "believe" it, or they are investigating the possibility? If you believe something you are sure of it.

It means imo, that the cops accept it's true as a workable theory that the FGM car was used to transport Williams's body but that further investigation provides the possibility of proving it.
 
It means imo, that the cops accept it's true as a workable theory that the FGM car was used to transport Williams's body but that further investigation provides the possibility of proving it.
But if it wasn't, it shows they are as much in the dark as they ever have been.
 
Is it me or is it strange that there seems to be no public information on the foster grand mother's death, no obituaries or funeral notices. So slient. This is one strange family and I can't help but wonder what they are hiding.
Not strange at all.

Her name was/is under suppression.

Don't publicly state the month she died.
Only media report that she is deceased (March 2021), months after she has actually deceased (Dec 2020 claimed by a poster in here)
Makes it harder to determine her suppressed name, which if known makes it easier to determine the the foster mothers name.

Keeps some of the media and sticky beaks at bay too for the funeral.
 
Most accounts through the press have the foster grandmother's death in March 2021. Via the ABC in November.

Maybe just going off a source of info that said she is dead, without that source saying whether she had just died, or in died in the months earlier.
Hardly surprising if everyone (including the media) just assumed she had only just died.

And with none of the media reporting that there had even been a funeral, that could also indicate that the funeral was months earlier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top