- Joined
- Oct 5, 2004
- Posts
- 17,169
- Reaction score
- 4,347
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Swan Dist, Rockets, Glasgow Rangers
Who days Mason come in for though? We already have one of the tallest forward lines in the competition with Amiss, Treacy and Voss. That leaves you with only 3 mediums/smalls at the drop of the ball from a centre bounce entry. With Jackson rotating through the forwardline, we potentially get even taller.
No teams are playing that tall in the forward line in the comp for the obvious reasons I specified (check out every other forward line in the AFL - it's one of the reasons the Pie's were happy to let Mason go) Surely you are not advocating for Cox on top of Amiss, Treacy and Voss up forward? In terms of role balance, it makes zero sense, and is practically begging to be exploited.
You need to back your midfield players to get better at using the ball, or change your midfield balance to get the right guys kicking it into the forwardline. Trying to excuse poor disposal with a team overly reliant on talls flies in the face of modern football, and leaves you with a swiss cheese forward line defence.
Cox plays round one if Darcy isn't ready. Around 50% game time, mostly in the ruck.
Surely if Darcy is fit Cox plays for Peel.











