Search results for query: *

Ok! Thanks for the heads up.:thumbsu:

Really? For a first year player he has been excellent IMO. He is best 22 already and some of his decision making and execution by hand and foot have been way above what we see from most of our other midfielders that have been in the system for years! Despite him being a rookie, I never worry...

No way in hell you will get Shuey if that is who they are after! In a team with a lack of class midfielders, Shuey stands out, he would be untouchable and is contracted for a couple of years.

You can have McGinnity, no probs. Not sure the Eagles want Conca either, the media here said Tigers offered him to us and we were "lukewarm".

That's what is pissing people off though, Frawley is NOT a top 40 player in the comp, he is just getting paid like he is. If he actually was a top 40 player, people wouldn't have a problem with Melbourne getting pick three for him. Put him up for trade in normal circumstances and there is no...

Judd was 24 when he was traded, not "a lot older" IMO. And he was pretty much a beast in the centre too! Carlton had spent 10 years near the bottom of the ladder, so they also needed a gun to get the ball. Top 10 in coaches votes? Try Brownlow Medalist, Premiership Captain, 2 x AA, Norm Smith...

Seriously, I know he is contracted, but that is way more than what West Coast got for Judd. I know you rate Fyfe, but when Judd was traded he was already a Brownlow Medalist and Premiership Captain, and arguably the best player in the league at that time. That is way overs for Fyfe.

I would do that if I was Freo. No player is untradeable. Pick one could get them exactly what they need! A quality young KPF. They have midfielders coming out of their ears, but Pav is 32 in a couple of months. They need to find a replacement now. Who knows, maybe Boyd could slot the regulation...

I think West Coast will be having a crack. Doesn't mean he will be willing to move West though. I am undecided if it would be a good or bad thing, I am leaning towards good (the first booze bus type incident after he signs will change my mind though!)

Then he wasn't following what the conversation was about!

There is no way Gardiner was top 5 at West Coast when he was traded. A top five player doesn't get traded with a swap of third round draft picks! Josh Kennedy didn't finish in the top ten in Carlton's best and fairest in 2007.

Do you really think Carlton gave us pick 3 and Kennedy for Judd because they were nice people?

Yeah, that's hilarious!:rolleyes: I seriously doubt anybody but the Saints are upset this deal didn't happen.

Nice troll. Your club wont let an un-contracted player get to the club of his choice, but we are the devil because we want a contracted player to honour his obligations?

L_W_P Cripps has had serious injury concerns and has a serious medical condition, would your club take him without a medical? So he does a Ball and refuses medicals/ interviews with anyone. As he is now back in WA it is really only Freo who would be a threat to us getting him, and they haven't...

Bit like Ball would never last until Collingwoods pick eh? You people never learn!:confused: Why would we not just wait until next year and get a similar deal? We get to keep our back up KPD and trade Brown next year to the highest bidder, I am sure Saints aren't the only team in Victoria that...

Change the two years to three years and it effectively describing Koby Stevens for West Coast. You win some, you lose some I guess.

Ah no. Similarly he hasn't threatened to not play for West Coast if we don't trade him, which we have no obligation to do. Like another poster has mentioned, West Coast stood by him and gave him a contract after he did his ACL, it is not as if it has been all take on West Coast's part. He...

Of course they have a say in it. Mitch had a say in it about 12 months ago when he signed a contract with West Coast. He knew the score then, and it is the same as it is now, he is behind Glass and Mackenzie in the pecking order. Nothing has changed from then to now, except St Kilda now think...

Any news about Stevens? I thought that was what the thread was about?

Sure he is, and I am sure you would.:rolleyes:

Same, but they kind of owe us for screwing us with Ebert!;)

I am sure you would be! There is no way in hell West Coast would willingly give up Schofield for Wellingham.

Good luck Sydney! If any team can get value out of a recycled player it's you guys, however the fact he has had issues with being part of a team in two different clubs so far would seem to indicate that the issue is his, not the clubs he has already played for.

Re: Brad Ebert Part 2 Yes, but we didn't waste pick 13 on Walsh did we? Or play him for four years when we could have been pumping games into someone else. It's different for players some how, although Sumich going to the purple still makes me feel off.

Says who? Collingwood just traded pick 25 for a rookie and a guy your last coach said he had serious concerns about in regards to his committment to the team, amongst other things. But wanting more than pick 28 for a player in our best 22 who is hard and committed to the contest, and always...

Spin it anyway you want, he was best 22 for 22 games this season in a top four club. That is factual. Your assessment of upside is subjective. West Coast obviously saw something they liked about him, or they would not have invested 70 odd games into him over the last four years. Port is...

For a start Brown hardly got a game all year. Ebert was chosen over Masten for the majority of the season. Embley and Nicoski will not be there for much longer than next year IMO. Schofield played every game except one if I remember correctly and Smith played all year until an injury late...

And people said your team would never be able to erase 2007 from their memories. Seems they were wrong. Tell me the last side that finished fourth with 17 wins and a percentage of 130? I agree, you should be carded for that comment.

So why is 28 off the table then?