Search results for query: *

Remove this Banner Ad

  1. Miguel Sanchez

    Vacant guernsey numbers

    They might have wanted to stay where they were.
  2. Miguel Sanchez

    Vacant guernsey numbers

    I’m lurking in the number changes threads on every team board and this one has easily the most heated debate. I’m loving it 🍿
  3. Miguel Sanchez

    Vacant guernsey numbers

    Chris Newman?
  4. Miguel Sanchez

    Vacant guernsey numbers

    Weren’t they before Hardwick’s time?
  5. Miguel Sanchez

    New Jumper Numbers 2024

    Coulthard and Tresize still there?
  6. Miguel Sanchez

    New Jumper Numbers 2024

  7. Miguel Sanchez

    Opinion Who Should get jumper numbers 5,6,7?

    Didn’t know anything about that but have done some research and it’s an interesting read. He left Richmond and signed with Sydney at the end of 1985 with Geoff Edelsten agreeing to a big transfer fee. Then he was allegedly late turning up for pre-season training and when he did show he was told...
  8. Miguel Sanchez

    Opinion Who Should get jumper numbers 5,6,7?

    Maurice Snr switched to 27 late in his career (not sure why), if Ross takes a lower number then 27 could be held over for Maurice Jr.
  9. Miguel Sanchez

    Play Nice Membership Barcodes

    Hi guys, commiserations on Friday night's result. I was really hoping we got the chance to play a rampant Tigers side in the big game. Just shows how bloody hard it is to get to a grand final. Bit of a long shot, but if anyone had purchased one of those package deals that includes an exorbitant...
  10. Miguel Sanchez

    Preview Number Changes For 2017 [UPDATED: 04/12/16]

    I'd liken my post more to accidently brushing a guy's junk. Does that make someone gay? Wasn't intended as a troll, just a comment on something I found an interesting coincidence. Clearly it's struck a nerve, I apologise for that.
  11. Miguel Sanchez

    Preview Number Changes For 2017 [UPDATED: 04/12/16]

    Go back through my 28,000 posts. I'm not one for trolling opposition boards.
  12. Miguel Sanchez

    Preview Number Changes For 2017 [UPDATED: 04/12/16]

    Just thought the recent history was a coincidence worth noting, that's all. Didn't mean any offence.
  13. Miguel Sanchez

    Preview Number Changes For 2017 [UPDATED: 04/12/16]

    I like the look of Bolton, was hoping he slipped a bit further to our second pick. Just thought the recent history was a coincidence worth noting, that's all. Didn't mean any offence.
  14. Miguel Sanchez

    Preview Number Changes For 2017 [UPDATED: 04/12/16]

    Hope it works out better than the last time they gave it to a highly-touted indigenous WA kid ;)
  15. Miguel Sanchez

    Competitions New Numbers

    Menadue 37 and Drummond 39 according to their Twitter profiles. Which would mean Gordon gets an upgrade
  16. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    No, I banned you from that one thread for trolling :)
  17. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    In other circumstances, you and Eagle87 would get along like a house on fire!
  18. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    If the ump had paid a free kick against Cox I probably wouldn't have complained. Well I would have complained, but two days later when I'd calmed down I would have admitted the free might have been there.
  19. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    Again, I've only got the one line quote from Maric so I didn't read the part where he qualifies his statement "when you're in the ruck" to mean "when you're in a ruck contest as defined by the AFL Rule Book". There's a big difference between "elbowing" and "being struck with an elbow"?
  20. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    Fair go, it was the one Maric quote the article chose to print. I haven't heard the full audio of his interview so I can only use the quotes available. You're splitting hairs. Does the "actual ruck contest" start when the two rucks line up against each other, or when the umpire released the...
  21. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    He may have expected a reaction, but not in the form of a punch to the head. He couldn't get near it, apart from his 18 hitouts in a bit less than a half? Compared to Vickery's 9 for the game. Any time you aim a punch at an opponent's head, particularly when they're not looking for it, you...
  22. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    That's a stretch. He said "we" (i.e. ruckmen) are "constantly" elbowing. Actually I'm not too sure why we're arguing. I agree with Keyser Soze's assessment and so do you. Vickery got hit with an elbow and was entitled to retaliate, but not by punching Cox in the jaw.
  23. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    I didn't claim it was not a reaction to provocation. It was an unjustified and disproportionate reaction to a relatively slight provocation. Attempting to equate elbowing in a ruck contest to racial vilification does nothing to aid your credibility either, just quietly.
  24. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    "When you're in the ruck you're constantly elbowing and bumping, which we love as ruckman," Maric told radio 3AW Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/michael-voss-calls-on-richmonds-tyrone-vickery-to-apologise-for-hit-on-dean-cox-20140726-zx5v8.html#ixzz38vu5rFJf
  25. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    I'm not trying to argue that Vickery should have just copped it. But if he wanted to retaliate there were better ways to do it than cold-cocking an unsuspecting Cox with a right to the jaw.
  26. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    Can't recall too many Eagles throwing king hits, at least recently. Fraser Gehrig did once, at Libba ironically, missed and got an umpire and somehow got off using the provocation defence. That's going back a fair while though. Must have been a pre-emptive strike ;)
  27. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    Malthouse's playing days were before my time mate. Nice try. One type of provocation is now recognised as being disgraceful behaviour resulting in serious consequences. The other is something that ruckmen do all the time, according to one highly-rated ruckman I have seen quoted on the issue...
  28. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    Because you were trolling.
  29. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    I'm saying the majority of his suspensions came when he retaliated against provocation, yes. How is all of this relevant to Vickery?
  30. Miguel Sanchez

    MRP / Trib. Vickery Gets 4 Weeks - Back for Round 23

    The one where he was getting racially vilified and snapped. Actually that was most of them.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top