No but part of a list rebuilding is also identifying list spots that provide greater value depending on who takes the spot, and having Ceglar on the list rather then a player like Walsh or Heath who have genuine future promise and youth on their side, and Ceglar is also taking up cap space
Brisbane (fragile ruck division)
Dogs (Martin might have another year, they like the 2 ruck dynamic with English)
Gold Coast (they have 1 ruck outside of Witts)
St Kilda (Ryder last year, Hunter not AFL Standard, Marshall more ruck/fwd)
I think the potential of our forward line setup could match the similar lineup of WCE
TO plays the Oscar Allen Role (Ruck/3rd Forward)
Two Key Talls (Kosi/Mitch - Darling/Kennedy)
Then your smalls
Becomes tricky with Gunno available but its a handy problem to have
Bramble, Nash, Howe, Hanrahan and O'Brien Out
Mitchell, Jaeger, Bruest, Scrimshaw and Lewis In
All the language post the North game was that Lewis would be playing Round 1
They are trying to make our midfield more flexible, play multiple roles HFF, wing, half back that type of thing, having 10+ rolling through the guts is the goal
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
t
Well not really
Our major issue is midfield sameness, and as much as i love Shiels, natural progression would hopefully allow guys like Finn, Cousins, Downie to take more prominent roles within the midfield, as well as the movement up from Day, Sheils perhaps becomes a second option