Well "eyes on the ball attempting to collect it" is a little different to simply "eyes on the ball"
I could argue "eyes" means nothing in this situation. How much of the post did you want to cut out to suit an argument?
For people wanting Cripps rubbed out - do you think he was
a) eyes on the ball attempting to collect it
b) eyes on the player electing to bump
For me - the vision I have seen - a) looks the most likely scenario. The fact Ah Chee is injured should only come into it once it has been...
I've only seen two angles - both of which are a little obscured.
However the reverse angle looks like he had his hands in a cupping position to collect the ball on his chest - which he is entitled to do.
Boland is damn unlucky - but do you think he is deserving of playing in the subcontinent?
Do you think he is a better bowler than Hazelwood?
Richardson has been deserving and based on performance, he now sits behind Boland as well.
It's not a VIC thing - it's a "we have three high quality...
Just saw the Warner dismissal.
Twas both a good ball that moved, but horrible batting.
He completely misread the length and got his feet in a tangle.
He should have been well forward to that, which would have negated much of the movement. It still might have beat the bat or taken an edge...