Oh, I watched the game on Fox. I clearly recall that it was mentioned that the umpire stated that Dunkley was the nominated ruckman. King and Healy's version of events are of no consequence to me. That you would use these two jokers as reference for your ridiculous argument is beyond amusing.
That in no way gels with the vision nor the umpires version of events, but do go on and tell me about the effect that that this non-event had on the game.
Dunkley was the acknowledged by the officiating umpire as the 'ruckman' during that contest. That fact that this happened off screen and the Bont putting his hand up after the event had no baring on the umpires ruling that Dunkley had been infringed. Which he had.
The rule as it stands is an...
Oh, what an original retort. I take it you couldn't find the image of Libba jumping into Montgomery's arms as the ball sailed through for a point? I'll give you a 'like' if you can work out how to edit it into your post.
17-1.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.