Search results for query: *

Depending on what you classify as the right coach?

No when he doesn't read this site. As far as I know, we don't have anyone posting under the name or alias of Patrick Dangerfield. It can not be emotional manipulation if he doesn't read or know about it.

The fact you could only quote one example at a moments notices, says you could only find one example. If you read a whole heap of examples; you would have found them easily enough.

If only it was Powerball.

LOL @ Spanner. However, you said "too many people", that would imply - it would be more than 1 person saying this. So, where are the rest?

BTW - who is actually doing this? I'm sure you can find a few posts and then quote them to strengthen your case?

This is why that Geelong flog should never be allowed to post on our board again.

It's our hobby.

But he worked out no one wanted him. Danger has a plethora of teams willing to pick him up.

I'll be Oscar Wild.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-trade-news-its-now-patrick-dangerfields-decision-say-waiting-geelong-cats-20150919-gjqe2t.html

STFU you fat barstard

Seen it too many times. Not confident we won't revert back to that group. Just as we did with VB and MacKay.

That we should just roll over and accept Danger is gone. Don't match as it won't be a good look.

I will guarantee you; Hartlett will not be a crow unless we pay massive overs on the trade.

I do. They still have enormous animosity towards us.

Get ****ed Steveo Sting. You are not a good look, why don't you roll over and * off.

They don't care. They will lose on a trade before doing a deal with us for a blue chipper like Hartlett

They do have a choice, they trade with someone else. It's called being obstinate.

We must negotiate and negotiate with strong intent. We must holdv strong and not buckle under the pressure Geelong will stay about how they don't have anyone worth trade. We must set out targets early, sell the club to those players (offer them an incrased contract would help) and then get the...

It doesn't mean we accept chicken scrapes either. We MUST put up a fight to get the very best deal we can. We can not accept this years and next year first pick from Geelong.

Did you only just start reading this book?

As soon as we match. He isn't a free agent. All rules revert back to a normal trade.

Pick 10, Cockatoo and Kolojasnik thanks.

Rubbish. Port Power will not do us a favourable trade.

Only coach in our history that wouldn't do this; Cornes and Blighty. Shaw (gutless), Ayres (chasing a flag), Craig (loved the senior guys) and Sando (chasing a flag) and even Walsh played a number of under performing players way too long. History tells me, we will select a coach who will...

If Hartlett asked for a trade; they would ask for Smith

Hartlett will be a seperate trade. Nothing to do with Dangerfield.

So pick 10 and say pick 16 - 20 for the best player in the league is sufficent? You are dreaming.

No. We have to demand a top 10 pick and a top 10 quality player. Getting Geelongs 2016 first round pick comes with too many negative variables and the risks are too great that we will loss out big time. Only way I accept Geelong's first round this year and next, is if the guarantee it to be a...