Search results for query: *

Out: JMac Back In: Ablett.

Yep = Sparse

How sparse are the rookie pickings this year? Spurr 50 and 70 and he will be the most popular trade....sigh

1133/9 (captain played Scotland Kreuzer Rance Boomer S. Selwood Deledio Martin Ziebel J.Mac and rookies to come....hoping for 2300...

Only going for the league/s win so going to continue with upgrading and downgrading as usual but will take the bye rounds into account when I do make a trade.

J.P.Kennedy, consistent and on fire

I floated this idea a while back on this forum to general derision so I don't think there is going to be much support. For the record, I love the idea.

Re: supercoach idea. It's certainly got merit especially in years like this when quality rookies are thin on the ground....and it would have saved me from having a starting midfield of Ablett and 7 rookies. The 4th ruck does seem to be a waste, maybe just make that player flexible ie::1 utility...

Boomer 4.7% Rance 2.4% S. Selwood 7.1% Boomer got sat on last week but still averaging 96, happy with all of them. Was happy with Carrazzo until last week.

8 here Bugg, Shiel. Kennedy, Macca, Giles, Smith, Treloar, Miles. Its way too many normally but in a pretty shite year for rookies they have the best job security and may moo quicker, if not as loud as others.

Boomer will want to bounce back after being well held as well, against the Suns he gets my vote.

:thumbsu: this Thats why VC's should get 1.5 points rounded to a whole number.

4/418 Carrazzo Scotland Clarke Kreuzer (thought he would have hit the ton...) Still happy and Pendles will be in the side sooner than I hoped.

Re: 2012 Which rookie do i start on the field thread I've got the same dilemma but have gone with Redden because of the Bogan coming in and not knowing whether Williams will play Giles at CHB and pinch hit in the ruck (lots of possible points) or put him in the forward line... Safer to go...

Div 23 Div 23. Don't know usernames, sorry. 83639 28606 25898 81434 16631 54661 1241 8746 94006 63689 21743 2155 34343 55034 37912 151469 2480 6738 Outside Sledge

Good call on the Magnet, BOG for the hapless Dees.

Re: 2012 SC Div 23 Shinboners is in

i'm in again, cheers.

Alex Silvagni for me then upggrade Darling to.....O'Keefe or similar

Complain.

Re: Rd 13 Trades Surely I. Smith will come into the Hawks now with some js...if so Krak > Smith Mundy > Ablett.

Re: Round 13 Captain I am getting on Buddy cos I am a gambler:D:D Thats probably why I suck at Super Coach :p:p

Dear Metlink, You remove your advertising and I will continue to refrain from defacing, delaying and derailing your trains. Dear Herald Sun, can you hear that creaking sound??? that's thin ice.

Re: Round 12 trades 1 trade this week either: Harris > Sylvia or wait until sylvia drops in price and go L.Thomson > Newman. Thoughts?

If it didn't say it next to your name Jobe (if that is your real name lol) then I would say that your response sounds just like an Essendon supporter... no real substance but loud and proud. If it aint broke don't fix it?.... Is there ANYTHING AT ALL that you would modify in Super Coach? Any...

or how about just not have any rounding at all? Or is that a bad idea because you could lose a game by half a point?

Ummm, forget what Maths (who-ever that is) tells you must happen and just round down any score that results in a decimal point. Rather than lending itself more to luck, I reckon this would lend itself to more control by the player and therefore greater self (coach) determination.... seems that...

I wouldn't gamble with my Captain, but my vice? For sure I would. rather than taking the safe option of a 100 point player getting you (50 extra points), I would be happy taking a Franklin type would may get an 80 (40 extra) but may just pull out a 160 (80 extra). to me that is a good...

I take your point, but the VC would still be there to mitigate the bad luck of your captain not playing (so not removing the whole reason VC's are there at all), if both were missing it would be an UN-mitigated disaster... But thats footy. Would it cause more frustration: Yes Would it be unfair...

That IS a ballsy idea, would cause lots of premium captains to be traded out in order to get a new captain. I like it.:thumbsu: Re: Vice vice and vice vice captain, seems pretty silly for you to take it that far. If you like safety nets how about the ultimate one....No captain at all.:rolleyes...