Search results for query: *

weird to accuse someone of theft for also having the idea of a spreadsheet with a lookup table of the (publicly available) points values.

Feels like they accidentally stumbled their way into something playable for a while, and then decided to completely change rucks, set shot, and opponent accuracy for no reason. Haven’t had the opposition kick a behind in five games, and gone from winning most ruck contests to losing every...

It's an absolute garbage fire

Why in gods name would you implement speccies when it counts as playing on and always results in at best a ball up, and usually a free for htb

The less the game crashes, the more apparent it is that the core gameplay is absolute ******* trash.

I’ll be honest I can’t see us conceding another goal let alone losing a game this decade o_O

I was saying boo-yrnes

It's okay champ, you were only 12 goals away from making the grand final and getting to replace 119.

Congrats dogs on a season you should be proud of. I think you were a bit unlucky to face a match-up where there were two really stark differences and both in our favour. The most obvious being ruck talent, but the other one being one of the fittest teams in recent memories while you've played...

Does Jack qualify when the first time he kicks more than 4 goals in his ten year career is against us?

Gee, Adelaide would be hoping Carlton don't get out of the bottom 4 next year or they are taking a bath on Gibbs

The only correct answer is Nev.

Paul Chapman. Based on this representative sample we're guaranteed to draft a Norm Smith medallist and triple premiership player.

31 for Watts is godawful

Gonna call this a worse trade than when we got in Dawes

One reason I've heard is that their player contracts didn't have an automatic increase written into them triggered by the EBA, so they're suddenly flush with cash. Potentially makes things interesting as their existing players go for new contracts though

My biggest issue is that an intercepting 3rd defender is categorically not the gaping hole in our list that you'd think it was based on that trade

What a garbage fire of an off season

Actually your side is uniquely stupid, and I'm not suggesting you're part of something sinister, you might just be earnestly dim.

Yes, and the point is that no one was harmed by the public nudity in question, so you're either a pearl clutching moraliser or just attempting to use "what about this other unrelated thing" to distract from an issue.

It's actually really simple if you have a functioning brain. One is a matter of an intimate photo apparently being shared without consent. The other there's no hint that it's been done without consent, so the only complaints are coming from pearl clutchers and whatabouters

Why do you care

I It's two different people

The Age reporting something along the lines of our first round this year and next, for Lever and whatever they get for Cameron this year (probably 19), and maybe a further pick swap involving what we get for watts. Trading out a first round pick in a good draft next year for an end of first...

Also really dumb given they'll get a lot less for him next year

*, I'm in, how do I get a freo membership?

Should brand the trade period the Jesse Hogan Speculation Memorial Trade Period imo

that's funny

Not everyone can have the loyalty of a Scott Thompson

I'd probably take that if for nothing else than to stop the dumb media beatup every single year