If GWS beat Geelong next week, I wouldn't mind Adelaide throwing the West Coast game.
If we won, we would (most likely) play Port or Sydney or (less likely) Geelong or Richmond.
If we lost, we would (probably) play Richmond or (possibly) Geelong.
Parvati was more fresh in people's minds during HvV with a more active style of gameplay. And Sandra was shielded by Parvati. They both have Russell largely to thank for getting to the end. 'If I take two winners to the end, everyone will have to vote for me! Nobody will let someone win twice!'
Tony will be back and hopefully he will lay low at the beginning of the game.
I remember Debbie's RHAP exit interview from Kaoh Rong and she said that she would never do Survivor again. I can't believe I fell for that lie.
Attention to all people applying for Survivor! Have a selling point!
Note that Matt had a selling point in his application process. He's a mentalist/magician/performer and that's interesting to viewers! Lee was a former cricketer, Kate was in an accident, Phoebe was a criminal lawyer and Evan...
The Smaller Warrior
I'd love to here what the pressure was like to actually play for $500K. I mean, the equation looked like this: stick with an alliance and have a small chance at winning $500K OR make a big statement, throw away that chance, become great television, a possible fan favourite...
In the Jury Villa, the jury seemed to be quite bitter about Flick.
How would she have gone if she had made it to the Final 2? Would she have got enough/any votes?
I would like to think that she would have won, because she turned into quite an entertaining and strategic player.
The final immunity challenge was fantastic. Well done to Kristie. I think she psyched him out in the end. Lee's final tribal council performance was pathetic. Nice guy. But he's not a survivor player and doesn't truly love the game.
Kristie outlasted obviously. She outwitted with respect to...
Sure, Adelaide were losers in this trade period. But at least we avoided being even bigger losers by not agreeing to the deal.
The real loser is Gibbs. Just goes to show that contracts don't 'mean nothing these days'. His fault for signing it in the first place.
This was the most poorly umpired Grand Final in recent memory. I noticed quite a few things during the game and watched again to confirm what I had seen of the Bulldogs free kicks. This is completely ignoring the non-decisions for Sydney.
Q1, 15:11 - "Push! Bulldogs!" Free kick was to Dunkley...
Patrick Dangerfield is the biggest wank out. He completely ignored me. Even went out of his way to get rid of me.
When I knocked on his door, he wasn't polite enough to invite me in. Didn't even open the door. Same for when I tried the back door. By the time I'd climbed onto the roof to enter...
This is a pretty unimportant question. But who is the first listed team for the Grand Final? Bulldogs because they came from the top side of the finals fixture? Or Sydney because they finished higher in the H&A season?
i.e. should it be
W. Bulldogs v Sydney; or
Sydney v W. Bulldogs?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.