Search results for query: *

Lollllllllllll

Ahaha yes haven't been on for a while might be time to change the username, any suggestions?

Not meaning to burst the bubble guys sorry, not my opinion it's a fact! Hopefully we're in his ear about a potential move but yeah not happening for the moment.

Forget Taranto, not happening.

No chance this happens. No chance.

Gotta love how it’s 'port had a bad day' when we beat them at home but when we get done by Geelong there's no excuse and we’re witches hats. Maybe just a bit hurt that we’ve overtaken you and you’re faced with yet another year of mediocrity?

Let's be honest he's not a 35-50 goal a year forward, he hasn't kicked 50 since 2015 his highest since then is 38. He's a 35-38 goal forward. He's very cover-able in that regard.

Could be a seriously good get for freo, yes he's been inconsistent af but he's been played out of position basically his whole career, having to play 2nd ruck even which is just crazy. Showed great potential early and has patches where he does really good things, if given a full crack in the...

No clue what the full deal looks like think it has to involve other clubs but confident it's not two firsts for hill

Yeah definitely 12 and 18 gone I think but unless something changes we are NOT giving two firsts for Hill

Okay sorry it's not two firsts

Hearing 10 and next year's first but with other clubs involved so not sure what we get back, hopefully something decent

Hope what I'm hearing is wrong or that we're getting something pretty decent back for it but yeah that's I've heard

Same

Hearing it's two firsts

What about 18 and Bruce for 13 and 32 12 and 13 for Howard Ryder 10 and 27 27 for Jones 10 32 and our future 2nd for Hill and their future 3rd Future 4th for Butler Leaves us with sfa picks this year unless we manage to get 37 for Steven (which still wouldn't sit right with me) but feel like...

This would be quite possibly the worst trade in history, basically trading 6 for 19 and 21, points are absolutely irrelevant, would rather do the Lovett trade 10 times over before doing this one.

Probably is due for a change isn't it

Let's just keep trading out young talent for picks, then as soon as they've played two years trade them for more picks and then do the same again!

Sorry but we've hit peak stupidity wanting to trade billings or gresham at all, let alone for a bloke who's played 14 games.

F**k I can't wait until this trade is just done.

What about, Hill and pick 24 for 5, 55 and next year's second rounder? Adds a bit of spice to the trade by the value being determined by how we go next year. Freo get pick 5 plus potentially a pick around 21-22 next year if things don't go well for us plus 55 for a bit of (albeit very little)...

Finding it really frustrating, when the combat is up and going it's fun but outside of that it's just frustrating af. Driving feels like you're steering a cruise ship and don't even get me started on trying to shoot from the car.

Milne criminally underrated, for obvious reasons but nonetheless, higher goal per game average than Betts and Rioli, would pick Rioli over him for what else he brought to a game but a better goal kicking small forward than Betts for mine.

This is incredibly nonsensical.

Pretty confident, if we play the way we did in that middle half last week we'll win because there's simply no way we can be as inefficient going forward as we were last week. Would also help if the other team don't play on high quality stimulants and go at 110% disposal efficiency in the first...

Really confused by this

Yeah because he's never gone well at any other time..

It depends what your basing the selection on, if it's potential that they've shown or runs on the board will determine where the likes of Mckay Curnow etc would be taken. But no matter what the criteria is, any list that doesn't have Oliver at number 1 is fundamentally wrong.

That's exactly how I heard it, no hyperbole was added.