While improbable I think its possible to go under 102k- A player would need to get several negative scores in a row, but if they spudded it up properly and managed a 5 round average of something like negative 30 I think they could even end up with a negative value?
He will go sideways while he's being the sub but he won't lose much- He'll get some full games eventually and will throw some 60-70's and make some cash. Im ignoring him unless we get some quality midfield rooks on the bubble to swap him to. (Same as Zach Reid)
Both have the same role+skills that we were happy to pay 600+K at the seasons start. I Think they are both intelligent trade targets and I would get both if I had the bank.
LDU V Dawson? Was going Dawson but seems like LDU may be a smarter play- Seems healthy and doesn't have the uncertainty that Dawson has with role+ LDU seems to have a much smaller variance....
Lol- I've got Fyfe, Yeo and Zilliams rolling the dice each week - Comben barely moves the needle on the risk factor this year! I might bring in Danger and Zorko next round just to see how much I can push the envelope :)
I brought in Comben because we need cash gen right now and he will make money provided he stays fit. He's a spud but should get to 350 while giving 10 points a week more than most of the rooks.
Was playing mid/half back for the first two and was a lot more visible- was wing last week and didn't see as much of it. That said I think he's been using it really well in all three games, and has won a few important contests.
Understand the reasoning but don't think we can drop MOC from the best 22- His start to this season has been the best form of his career IMO. Zuthrie also starting in good touch this year. If Parfit+ those two can play at this level for the rest of this year it will be huge for us.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.