Search results for query: *

Remove this Banner Ad

  1. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    It's not so much my interpretation but rather it's the interpretation of any person with half a brain cell. It's the fact of the law, you can't convict without evidence and you can not break the law in order to gain evidence. Clearly you have some sort of issues in regards to understanding of...
  2. ArmandD

    Current GoFundMe backfires & swindles

    Another burglary by "trolley man", makes me ask the question why he had the trolley he used against the suspect, maybe a trolley is one of tools of his trade lol. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/trolley-man-michael-rogers-behind-bars-after-alleged-burglary-20181130-p50jil.html
  3. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    Blazinga nothing, yes they went before a jury and were convicted but the jury convicted them based on "evidence" gathered illegally. The simple and quite logical point you are missing here is that if that "evidence" had not been gathered they may very well have never been charged let alone...
  4. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    Read this article: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/i-risked-all-for-police-top-lawyer-speaks-out-20100430-tzfw.html Then compare it with the letter from lawyer x here: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-04/informer-3838-criminal-lawyer-to-police-informant-her-own-words/10579100
  5. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    I think you should understand that there is and must always be a clear and distinctive division between the courts and the police. Members of the bar are NOT police. Your own article should be understood to mean that a member of the bar(solicitor, barrister, qc etc) should work in...
  6. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    I mentioned earlier that she has cost taxpayers millions in court fees in regards to the suppression orders but there's also what she has now cost them in regards to what now amounts to wasted money on the investigation. Every piece of evidence she directly provided is tainted and would...
  7. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    As defined by Wikipedia it is: In Australia, legal professional privilege (also referred to as client legal privilege) is a rule of law protecting communications between legal practitioners and their clients from disclosure under compulsion of court or statute. While the rule of legal...
  8. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    I don't think anything has been lost in translation but rather and without meaning any insult, it's more a lack of understanding of what it says. To me their first duty is to the court, its rules and in maintaining its integrity and then to their client, she did not uphold her duty to the court...
  9. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    Also if I was advising anyone directly affected by her breach of privilege I would raise a question to them as to wether or not they would be eligible to restitution from her personally and/or whatever firm she was employed with at the time. The reason being that I would consider engagement of...
  10. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    IMO her actions have cast doubt onto any and every legal matter she has ever been involved in over the course of her career. To not waste your time and put it simply: if she has such a fundamental lack of understanding in regards to her obligations and the illegality and unethicalness of...
  11. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    Does anyone else notice similarities between lawyer x's story and the person in this article? https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/lawyer-suing-police-chief-identified-20100430-tyzp.html
  12. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    It's NOT Zarah, there are plenty of article floating around online that name the barrister responsible for suing vicpolice in 2011. I find it to be a more disturbing issue that since 2014 the Victorian government has allowed the expenditure of millions of dollars in court fees for suppression...
  13. ArmandD

    Current Royal Commission into Lawyer X gangland convictions on tainted evidence & police corruption

    https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/lawyer-nicola-gobbo-offered-to-wear-wire-for-paul-dale-meeting/news-story/799c3581f4a8bc51f652eb558f657aa5
Back
Top