Baldwin is an upgrade on Laverde and given Kelly plays on smalls and medium forwards, no, McKay can’t easily replace him.
Personally I see McKay as superfluous and I’d be trading out Lav while convincing Zerk to stay.
Out of curiousity, are you also going to have a go at whoever has Georgedis next year, or North sticking with Comben, etc.? Or is it just EFC that will be potted for keeping young injured talls around?
Not quite correct. Rookie upgrades count as players picked, and we currently have 7 rookies for 4-6 spots. Theoretically we could cut one player, take no draft picks, and we'd be fine.
Obviously they won't do that, but it does give us additional flexiblity. We could also pay out Stewart for his...
No, we were awash with cash. The suspended year we didn't pay suspended players salaries, and the later legal settlement didn't come out of salary cap. So we saved a bundle. Hibberd just wanted out after Goodwin sweet talked him.
You do realise (other) teams know to man up on the oppositions...
Hibberd was AA …
Others not mentioned who were mature aged recruits since 2010: Walla, Martin, Durham, Snelling, Crameri, Ambrose, Guelfi, McKernan and M Brown. I'd say that group has done pretty well.
Those guys were moved to the rookie list to change a rookie pick into a ND pick. They were...
Then Scott should have a long hard look at himself. The style we're playing is that our half forwards are going up and getting involved in the contest. Which leaves the forwards in our F50 horribly out-numbered for good chunks of the night. This was the primary reason for them continuously...
I'd have no problems going in with all three next year (on the list), but prioritising Bryan. The message has to be to Bryan that he'll get game time, because we really really need him to stay.
Best outcome would be that North "poach" him on a 2 year contract, we get Band 5 compo, he learns a bit under Clarkson, and if he wants to coach with us comes back with more experience and knowledge of how Clarkson sets things up.
:cool:
If it’s not viable it’s not viable. From the outside it seemed like he wasn’t needed/can’t stay on the park, and it might be worth pay to free up potentially $2.7m of cap. So I asked the question.
Sounds like Carlton fans are happy to keep him.
We don’t really know what the Suns’s draft hand will be. If say Flanders still leaves they’d probably get a teens pick, and have no need of other 2023 picks.
The only reason it was structured that way was for Brisbane to avoid paying a big price. That doesn’t apply to McKay. You’ll get similar in a trade to Band 3 compo.
There are a lot of people in this thread who seem to know McKay and his personal drivers amazingly well! Personally, I doubt anyone really knows what his personal preferences are and how much he wants to stay/get out of North, and therefore what kind of salary is required to lure him.
It could...
Williams accepted a six year deal on Band 1 compensation that was reputed to average $900k in 2020. Since then the midfield plan has failed, and he’s will have played 23 games of a possible ~67. Carlton is needing salary cap to retain players and look for more.
Williams has three years left...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.