Search results for query: *

With Pfizer’s past history it wouldn’t surprise. Helps explain the ongoing extended EUA / states of emerg as well as the push to give children an outdated vaccine for current strains. As once it’s on the kids schedule, they are indemnified from legal action post EUA.

Israel, what’s going here? Too many doses?

Israel not trending well

Is he referring to the CCP card carrying types??

Interesting Sweden aren’t doing 5-11yos Maybe they waiting for updated omicron version? STOCKHOLM, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Sweden has decided against recommending COVID vaccines for kids aged 5-11, the Health Agency said on Thursday, arguing that the benefits did not outweigh the risks. "With the...

What about the nurses who cared for Covid patients all through 2020 and most of 2021 then got the boot late last year for not getting vaccinated ? I know people overseas this happened to. They did 99% of the lifting.

Trust your govt hey? We are all in it together they say. People couldn’t visit family while Downing St has a massive piss up. But again, why telling us all now? It was sat on for nearly a year. Btw how’s the loaf. He can’t be serious

Lol. He will be saying this after the 10th jab

Just seen that the US FDA have been ordered by federal judge to provide Pfizer’s vaccine trial data at a rate of 55,000 pages per month (orig fda only had to provide 500 a month which would have taken 55 years).

Tens of thousands of cases here. 100s of 1000s overseas. Vaccine clearly has no impact on stopping transmission so there is no argument for young kids to have to get it to protect the old and vulnerable.

12 weeks!?

Is it the same Walensky that in March said we can see the end bc vaccinated people don’t carry the virus and don’t get sick?

Latest from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) re Omicron: 50-70% lower risk of hospitalization than Delta

https://t.co/C9dG6HiZhi

Be interesting to see what the judge delivers. Surely in the interest of public confidence they can publish more than 500 pages a month, esp when as noted it took only 108 days to analyse the 300,000 page document and then approve eua. In such unprecedented circumstances the public have a right...

Can someone confirm or deny that the FDA don’t have to release the full data from the Pfizer vaccine trial that was used to grant EUA for 55 (or 75) years? I keep seeing this being tweeted…clthat they only have to release 500 pages per month, yet they approved on the back of 10 or so weeks...

Well there’s been a few things correct - remember when this was dismissed as conspiracy despite some crazy scientists saying the odds of it naturally occurring was improbable. The next question i suppose is exactly how and when. And why this long for it to be start being accepted / promoted...

Like a cold?

Hmmm, so what if Covid didn’t start in late 2019….but was around in 2018. https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwab223/41726009/nwab223.pdf

Cold weather now causes heart attacks

There’s a new disease.

A few assumptions in there. Not intending to be a victim, was a part relation to “vermin” and NT minister who mentioned even offering comfort to was anti vax. Anyway, good luck all, I’m a sceptic from the start of all this inc the date of origin amongst a few things, not a fan of coercion or...

That’s just an article explaining it’s fully approved by the FDA. The question is why won’t the FDA release the full trial data and analysis given to them by Pfizer for the public to see? It took them roughly 2-3 months to trawl through it all before approving the vaccines …but the public...

It’s not. The data exists. The term breakthrough infection didn’t arise due to people having had Covid before and it breaking through their natural immunity

To help stop misinformation the Govt should release the full data that was used to approve the vaccines and enforce lockdowns. When do you think that will happen?

Yes like natural immunity doesn’t exist. Mind boggling. This is the new science apparently.