Search results for query: *

Contemplating the number 1 draft pick in April. Just another year at North Melbourne.

3 - Sheez 2 - Biggie 1 - Curtis

3 - Xerri 2 - Sheez 1 - LDU Coaches - warlord

family reasons….hmmm…

17 clubs disagree with you.

Maybe this is a plan to rookie draft Shoenmaker with a 1 chance behave or f**k off contract.

So great to hear the polo is Carlton colours. I thought for a moment it was the Cats.

Leake or Wilson. Winning!

Just 2 and 3 for WC1 and F1. We take Harley Reid and a top 2 pick next year and they can have Kerch and Curtin. Everyone gets what they want. Including the players.

I believe that is Fisher…..hopefully with less of the “anywhere”

If Wet Toast are willing to give up F1 for pick 7 (Curtin), then surely they would swap their F1 and F2 for our pick 3 (4). They’re most likely bottom 2 next year so we’d be swapping 4 for 1/2 and 20 and making out like bandits.

Aged about as well as him not wanting Bailey Scott.

Some folks didn’t want Sheez and Wardlaw last year. Not interested in another inside mid and boring utility. These people wanted to fix the gap with Cadman or Hollands or Tsatas. Thank God we went for talent over need last year. We have to do the same this year.

I heard this conversation began with a desire to include #8 in a package to get #1. I am assuming (and hoping) that’s no longer an option given the Sanders consideration, although 2, 3 and 8 for WC1 and F1 would be a blast. If O’Sullivan is not the goal with 8, then I can only assume we are...

I’m not sure if he’s a kpd or a tall flanker, but you’re right - no one outside of BF would consider Curtin to be a reach.

Good pickup by you. Looks sensational in the highlights. Worth taking a punt on the behavioural stuff to get a player who might be a cut above.

DeMattia, Gothard, Green and Goad mentioned with our later picks. Not sure about DeMattia but the rest make sense. Sounds like Cal expects us to take a ruck.

He was a mid first of all, but yes, even as a pure forward he’s a jet.

Is Duursma likely to be a pure forward or forward/ mid? I’m trying to think of a pure HFF currently playing who’s worthy of a top 5 pick.

Agree. Even worse if it’s pick 25 instead of a teens pick. Much prefer our current hand than overpaying for 8 and then overpaying again for 1.

A conversation has occurred. I’m just bloody nervous it may be with the intention of handing over 8 + one of our first two.

Is Duursma an equal or better forward than Reid? Is McKercher an equal or better mid than Reid? Close enough. Better to take our current picks to the draft.

The smart move for Brady would be to start making an overt play for Geelong’s pick 8. If WC is holding out for a better offer they’d realise they risk getting no deal at all. It would force them to contemplate the deal on the table or acknowledge they’re not actually seriously interested in trading.

Was wondering why we hadn’t heard from groin guru for a while. I guess he too has shipped off to *.

Can someone clarify for me what legitimate legal recourse Clarko has to pursue Hawthorn? I get defamation against Phil Egan, Rusty and ABC, but Hawks did not write about Clarko and I presume it can’t be proved that they leaked the story. Therefore I can’t see how they defamed him. If...

No news, so I assume he just has diarrhoea on loop.

InB4IknowBarrettisaflogbutIlistenedtihispodcastandnowIamangry.

I believe he has us selecting Watson at 2, 3, 15, 17 and 18, so unfortunately no room for Rogers.

Always appreciate your insights RF8. Going off nothing but champs videos, I can understand your position on Edwards as a mid, but could you see him making it as defender? I liked his decision making and use by foot. Also, it interests me that you seem much more into Hastie than most, but not...

There’s a lot of ifs in there buddy. Wish I shared your optimism. I’d have more confidence in Murphy with pick 15 than any of the above except Logue.