This is really as far as your argument is going, not sure that there's much value in the rest of the statistical analysis. In what seems like a slump statistically he's the better player.
But the real point about the impact is that he's he's not kicking enough goals. Which is true.
That's pretty solid value.
Love Devonta, and feels like he did the team thing here by locking in early and before the market gets massively re-set by JJ, Ceedee etc.
The Carlton game, a year to the day, was the last really good game that he played. His form on the back end of '22 was probably not sustainable on the level of targeting he gets, but the base line should not have fallen to having no possessions in a half, which he nearly did again yesterday...
And that they started with a plan that any sensible person would have known was doomed to fail and had in fact failed before: the Crouch and Laird midfield.
You think they made a decision a month ago that this was their preferred midfield, but didn't play it that way because they were only prepared to conduct a slow transition?
Remember when like not even 12 months ago people were claiming Rory Laird was a starting midfielder at every team in the country? Dude shouldn't even be one at our club.
We won because of our ascending players: Soligo, Rankine, Rachelle, Berry all big at various times.
Maybe let's stop going backwards (literally) to the Crouch/Laird crutch.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.