Search results for query: *

Papa's a fluffer for the alt right who will not respond to any of this criticism

Gee, who'd be a moderator. Papa G = fluffer for the alt-right.

I used to think this growing up. But at the end of the day who cares. It's a minor issue in the world of Cricket.

Does anyone have any idea how scores/results have fared at Karen Rolton Oval? Without any data to back it up, the seems like a bit of a road.

How do you follow the footy?

I just saw Glamorgan used 11 bowlers!

That was an unbelievable win by the women. A big choke by India. An incredible finish. Redbacks 😞 No lets not restructure district cricket, because politics.

Great win in the cricket. Massive choke from India.

Have a Snickers

Feeling tired for years must feel pretty average. Do the trial. Stick at it for the two weeks. It may take a bit too get used to at first, but keep at it. It really can enable you to get a decent night's sleep and make you feel a whole lot better in yourself. You deserve that. Make sure they...

Reverse parking is easier in my ute, seeing as though it has the turning circle of the Titanic. I usually avoid busy carparks like the plague though.

Is starting to do an Amon. F**K the haters Riley.

Marshall for Powell-Pepper is not a bad call. Glad he's back.

Pour it in a glass

Maybe no religion could be subdivided further

Doubt it, they're all the same

The psychology is interesting hence having a distinction between no religion, atheism and even being agnostic. There's a clear difference between all three. But if you object to atheism being thought of as a religion (if though some atheists can come across as "fundy") just tick no religion...

Just because you don't have a religion doesn't mean you're an atheist or don't believe in God. Making the distinction is relevant to how society is progressing (or not).

We need a tell all Macca!

You can see from 46s in that video that Stratton plays for a free by falling to the ground. It looks quite comical really and causes Charlie to fall over. Charlie adds a bit of mayo with the elbow, but not a lot he could have done.

Spot on Macca. As you allude to, the tribunal looks more at the outcome than the act. It's only that Lycett was scapegoated for his act.

No there shouldn't be a neutral differential. Undisciplined teams should be in the negative. Disciplined teams in the positive. That's not too say that this is how it plays out, but it's how it should play out.

Such a boring thread.

Both Ladhams and Hayes deserve the development that Marshall has had as well. By not dropping Marshall we are putting all our eggs in the one basket, and giving him no incentive to meet the required standards. If Marshall isn't taking marks and kicking goals, then you'd want him to be working...

He's tracking well. Impacted early. A quiet second half coincided with Hawthorns forward half dominance. Coincidence or not, Charlie had a good second half.

Yeah, what does that have to do with Tasmania? And no, this doesn't relate to Broken Hill

Dunno, did we?

Lol, bloody Andrews and his overreach into Tasmania

It would be good to get the club's metrics in how they assess Marshall's performance. I think he's an important component to our structure, where as Georgiades and Ladhams aren't as well versed in that area. He's had a decent season, but where he has failed has been where the rest of the...

goodnight