Search results for query: *

Agreed. Hopefully he has a desire to play with his brother in a couple of years 😂

:rolleyes:

Bigfooty concluded we lost many of these types of trades in the past, yet we have done very well from most of them in hindsight 👍

But is he a bull? vandenBerg is a bull I heard

Pretty sure i saw this stat in a recent article. Mitchell was something like 51/49 between his preferred and non-preferred (if you can call it a preferred for him). Angus Brayshaw was the next closest of current players at 62/38 or something similar.

Steven Smith - partner at a large commercial law firm and president of the MCC. Not bad to keep busy after football

Gotta love the timing... a few days before Christmas. Perfect time to announce charges and minimise media attention.

The timing of Anderson's "resignation" is interesting - as is the suggestion that his authority was set to be reduced.

He isn't prohibited. He can be drafted if he is good enough.

At least he ran the time trial. Apparently Gysberts refused to run them if it was too hot.

How about this... you name the players that have had surgery on both hips, and we will say whether the surgery affected their careers.

Thurlow is the steal.

Worthy draft choice just for his name.

In the NRL, didn't the opponent still have to beat the Storm to get the points? In other words, if their opponent won, the opponent got their points; if Storm won, no one got points?

Don't hold your breath.

It's not an unreasonable assumption. At the very least they know they will get lower picks next year - even if they won the flag, they would get pick 18 (compared to 20 this year).

Of course a Bulldogs supporter would say that. Not a chance of Melbourne following suit - nor should they.

It would be a good year for them to lose picks. Good strategic move

Throw the book at him.

Floo Network.

A million bucks of debt will double next year? Things are worse than I thought.

More of a reflection on Brayshaw. He is not cut out for presidency. He has played his part in keeping the Kangaroos in Melbourne (mostly) - time to pass on the baton. His blunders are starting to add up.

Well yes, but perhaps it is cheaper for the Government to move AA and subsidise this soccer club rather than continue with the status quo. Who knows. I just think its easy for supporters to jump to conclusions on these matters.

Every club gets Government funding for facilities. Why should Collingwood be any different?

I suggest you go back and read your original post and then ask yourself whether anything in what I have just quoted is relevant. You seem to be confusing the issue (and yourself) more by attempting to explain yourself. Notions of cost/penalty and product/crime values have nothing to do with your...

The perks of not having a CEO to pay.

No, but that wasn't your argument. You did argue one way over the other - there is no denying that. You initially said "given this kind of inflationary perspective, it looks like you've not only reached that level, you've possibly surpassed it". You attempted to use inflation to bolster your...

If by "rigid fixation on direct meaning" you mean correcting your completely wrong reasoning, then yes.

Yeah... no. Kudos for recognising that inflation exists. Points off for getting it completely wrong though. $20 today is worth less than it was in the 90s. Adelaide's breaches (at least those reported) are not even close to the breaches by Carlton, Essendon and Melbourne in the 90s/00s. That...

So... his time at the club was supposedly better than Cook 's equivalent start at Geelong, yet he was "getting ahead of himself"? Everyone knows why he left - Kangaroo supporters choose to blame everyone but their president though.