Search results for query: *

Is he not fit enough to play a full game in the middle? Bring wasted up forward especially when we need grunt there.

Even Geelong wanted nothing to do with Ken taking over from Bomber, took our interview notes about Chris Scott and appointed him.

Montgomery was so weird that we promoted him to the midfield line role and then sacked him

Here's the thing, Koch and co wants Carr to be Hinkley 2.0. What is even the point of a succession if that is the plan. You may as well keep Ken and keep beating bottom 10 teams.

News about Soldo kills any excitement for me with the others getting dropped. At least Sweet cannot be worse than Teakle

Good thought, would be worth keeping an eye on Brad if Carr goes as well as Ben Rutten.

Unpopular opinion but what if Boak in his prime spent the offseason hours on his kicking instead of getting his body ripped in the US.

Nah he's average at SANFL level too

Should count blessings that we were able to bring in Soldo, Sweet would have made us just as bad as having Lycett last year. Also told you so that Hayes is better than Sweet.

Reminder that we rushed McKenzie and Lycett back into the side last year to save Ken his job and then concluded last year's failure of a season was because of bad luck

Isn't basically every position at footy clubs unpaid except for the players, coaches and managers?

There's huge hints of Carr being as successful as Ben Rutten too

It's taken 13 years for the Victorian media to question Ken's record against top 8 sides. Bet none in SA will even question it.

You guys knew Tredrea would need to change his tune in the media after joining the board, why are some of ya'll upset about that

Someone explain how LIV Golfers are millionaires but no one watches the sport

I remember him being sold to us as someone who could be one of the best HBers in the comp lol

Step one of a succession plan is that the predecessor has had actual success. You just feel it's going to fail. Especially with more time he spends under Ken.

It's only the club that rates him. No club looking for a coach wanted anything to do with him when he was in his final year.

Ken Hinkley explains the 73pt turnaround in press conference: “Well, there were some numbers that were pretty easy to see if you look at the numbers ... they were playing aggressive and continue to play aggressive but what they did when they played aggressive was continue to turn up.” That is...

Not watching his presser, did he over praise the opposition

I noticed that most Collingwood kick always went to a player leading. Even the unintended ones that dropped short.

Don't worry guys, we are about to peak. At this time last year, we started our 13 game win streak. We're coming.

Can we stop his forward stints and just leave him in the ******* middle

Collingwood rusty after the bye maybe?

Nah his selection next week will be justified because we had a mini fight back when he was subbed in although he didn't do anything

I take back what I said about him being skilled but lazy. He is actually unskilled too. What are those handball lmao

lol we all knew that there would be a mini fight back in the fourth to the praise of Ken too

Way too early. Should have played safe naming Houston or Wines.

3 port players run into and block each other as Collingwood handball from HB to forward

Our midfield is too lightweight. Skilled players no doubt but there is no grunt. They are easily bodied off the ball, they cannot stick tackles. I'm not sure what the solution is but I'm pretty certain it's more than just Wines and Drew taking some centre ounces