Search results for query: *

Why don’t you answer the question? How do you know there is ONE god, as you have claimed?

How do you know this?

That may make it credible to them, but the comment that I was replying to seemed to be implying that the claims made about it (authorship, accuracy, historicty) should be credible to all. The entirety of the Bible is claimed by some on here to be more than it is. Inerrant. Literal. Historical.

Credible in terms of what? Who are these Biblical scholars? Are they merely apologists with theology degrees or doctorates or they actual historians?

This is exactly the problem I have with it as well. Just adds to the inconsistency of decision making from the MRO, the tribunal and by extension the AFL which is frustrating for observers.

Adelaide Lions - Round 6 B: Brayden Maynard, Harris Andrews, Brandon Starcevich HB: Lachlan Ash, Jayden Laverde, Rhylee West, C: Rory Laird, Andrew McGrath, Cameron Mackenzie, HF: Cameron Rayner, Esava Ratugolea, Jason Horne-Francis F: Bayley Fritsch, Joe Daniher, Lincoln McCarthy R: Oscar...

They may not have known the 'true' story, written 600-800 years after the events it purports to describe are supposed to have occurred. The Septuagint (Greek translation of the Hebrew) translates Exodus 12:40 this way: 'Now the sojourning of the children of Israel that dwelt in the land of...

Possibly. There is no evidence that this is actually true. This is yet another unsubstantiated claim by you.

Your claim to one god is unsubtantiated. I see no reason to accept your premise.

Ok. So where's the supporting evidence for that?

Of course they exaggerate. However there are other sources that support the actual event of the Persians invading Greece. No other extra-biblical source supports the historicity of the Exodus - where a enslaved people called the 'Israelites' leave Egypt after a series of plagues, wander the...

Of course there were large floods. But no global flood There's no evidence to support an Exodus. These ancient accounts are claimed as literal (i.e historical) events. Then perhaps those 'exaggerations' and 'hyperbole' shouldn't be claimed as fact. Refuting claims to fact without the...

Based on the weight of empirical evidence in support. The findings of genetics, geology and archaeology for example. They have refuted Adam and Eve and the Great Flood outright and placed a huge amount of doubt on the historicity of the Exodus. Feel free to present evidence to the contrary...

Historians and archaeologists attempt to establish the truth to claims to the historicity of events described in the Bible.

It’s not really for them.

:rolleyes: Sure you do. Like the flimsy evidence you provided for the historicity of the Exodus?

The Gospel of Roylion is always accurate. You might say inerrant.

Genetic impossibility. Do a search and read it.

Not in the case of a first couple. Genetically impossible, as has already been explained. Do a search and read it.

Well you should read it. And have a little faith as you do.

You need to read more of the Gospel of Roylion to improve your disposition.

Indeed it is proof. Genetic studies shine a cold hard light on silly unproven, unsupported claims.

He needs to read more of the Gospel of Roylion to improve his disposition.

You missed the "Au contraire' obviously.

Genetics disproves it. I've said this many times and explained why.

I follow the Gospel of Roylion. As you should. It is an excellent guide to life.

There is absolutely no evidence in the geological record for a Great Flood and genetics disproves any claims that a first human couple existed.

The Gospel of Roylion tells us to ignore inaccurate claims.

But with no supporting evidence that it actually occurred.

Au contraire. I have merely been asking for evidence in support of Biblical events claimed as historical events. You know...the usual... Adam and Eve, the Global Flood, the Patriarchs, the Exodus, the Israelite Conquest of Canaan and so on.