KB would bight Daicos's nose off and spit it back in his face. Wasn't even a squib, let alone the world's biggest. Ever wondered why with all the king hitting going on in the 1970's nobody ever tried their luck with KB?
Nick Daicos = K Mart Brad Hardie.
Hardie won a Brownlow Medal in his first season in the competition after starting in the backline then ignoring his defensive duties thereafter. So the world's biggest squib is not even the first or best in this role, let alone the GOAT.
Lol Fadge. 8th highest rated player in the game despite being fed by far the most uncontested possessions with 22 + kick ins. He has your whole franchise trying to make him BOG and they can't get the squib into the top 7 on the ground. :tearsofjoy:
Can confirm the answer is no.
The only contested mark Nikos is ever going to take is he is paid a mark for a little backwards chip that travels 12 metres and the opposition contests the umpire's decision to call it a mark. :)
6 "contested" possessions, though obviously not too heavily contested or he wouldn't have taken possession.
4 intercept possessions.
20 times he took a kick in or his team-mate who had already won the ball gave it to him, often by going backwards.
1 tackle, lol.
Still only went at 70%...
Did not see one decision either end within scoring range fall Brisbane's way and about 10 decisions/non-decisions went Collingwood's way within scoring range. Was the whole difference in the scores in the end. It was so obvious.
Providing he is fed by the whole team, and doesn't have any oppo attention, and no opponents get between him and the Sherrin. If all that occurs, then he will be the best around according to Fadge. :tearsofjoy:
Judging by the exclusiveness of his mail, his source is Fox Footy. Absolutely laughable stuff by RJK Tiger the detail he has given was all publicly reported at the time.
I would certainly like watching him play if I was playing against him. He just jumps out of the way and kindly allows you to take possession of any disputed ball.
I am perplexed as to how you could think this post answers the points in my post.
For a start you are claiming to have some inside oil. Yet all "misdemeanours" committed by "Richmond" you have referred to were widely reported in the media at the time.
The AFL gave Richmond the maximum...
The trouble with the AFL whingeing through their media shills about Richmond's behaviour in the hub is that there is nothing substantial in it bar:
the Stack/CCJ hub breach for which the cub was duly punished and which the club did not have direct control over, and
the Mrs Cotchin breach and...
Meanwhile hard hitting industry investigative reporter and CFL shill Wok Fry Barrett responds to the issue and Melbourne's drug culture problems by writing a very damning piece on AFL.com.au
https://www.afl.com.au/news/1095159/damian-barrett-no-self-pity-as-melbourne-seeks-to-tame-its-demons...
When you are faced with the tough choice between bribing campaigners and blackmailing them, bribing costs money, blackmailing pays you.
This is why I am vehemently against bribery in any form Gru. ;)
I used to be a very bad PI. What I was good at in that line was repossessing cars. We could just take possession of every umpire's car when they are at training, and tell them if they want their car back, we want fair umpiring, with a little bit back our way for all the years of suffering...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.