Search results for query: *

Pretty much agree with all this. KPD situation is a worry tbh - Jamieson has been a surprise, but it's not clear he has the ability to ever actually step into a central role. Acquiring Busslinger sounds good given his pre-draft status, but his not breaking into the AFL at all yet isn't a great...

The real question is - how many broken tackles? Genuinely though, is that stat actually publically recorded anywhere?

How does this sentiment square with this one?

"further a-forward"

I remember taking a shining to Ginbey mid draft-year and hoping we'd end up with him, but at the time I figured that would be second round. Coming to feel a bit iffy about the outcome, given we started with pick 2. Hinges on Hewett, of course, but now his foot is concerning. Obviously, I...

Did Hough have a disposal that wasn't a turnover/rushed handball to no one/kick with way too much air?

Don't go back to the old song in any iteration. Just change it. There's no 'good version', the song in its essence just isn't right. Of course reverting back will be an improvement from what we have now, but we'll just be going from abominably bad, back to plain old ordinary still the worst...

Dylan82 ??

So what are the feelings like for you when WCE jump ahead and grab Hall? Conflicted?

What does this mean?

More importantly, why were we so keen on the trade? Our f1 is likely a top 3 pick, in a draft with (apparently) a very strong midfield cohort at the top, We rate Curtin that high? Any mini red sausages in the war room spread at least?

Shouldn't this always be the case? Or rather, what does it mean for two players to be of equal talent, but one with better skill level, athleticism and work rate? Could you give an example of a (real or imagined) toss-up between two players where this principle would come into play?

I do. Clearly I'm thick because I've missed what everyone is apparently 'hinting' at.

Interestingly enough, it looks increasingly like the Pieman has been laying off the pies. BOND 007 can you confirm?

Okay but how does this somewhat speculative (even if informed) view translate into "absolutely" and "guaranteed"?

go on

re Brockman? Or other negotiations?

now THAT's the response I was after

See above. In principle I agree - let's all log off and re-convene in three months then when we can assert only with absolute certainty.

Seems respected enough/listened to amongst them. Other than that, meh - aren't we all indulging in this with a sense of irony anyway? There's no reason to wholeheartedly trust anyone on here, the truly sensible thing to do would be to simply abstain from speculation and rumour-mongering...

And yet allegedly we did, that's the point.

Bit more from the Hawks board from supposed ITK: pantskyle WCE_phil any thoughts on how that jibes with what you know? It's the first part that interests me -- would indicate that ROB's line about being comfortable sitting on pick 1 unless some special offer comes our way is largely just spin.

And 14 and 19 would blow out to two picks in the 20's, right? I guess we do need to replace O'Neill and Foley.

Reminds me of Sheed when playing in the middle.

To some degree it is, yeah. I'm sure I could make it work. But why so many hurdles, as opposed to being readily able to stream it online?

Well yeah, cool, I can squint at it on my phone...

Why on earth are these games not available to stream live??

Maybe for most clubs, but aren't we pretty in love with Curtin?

Do you have a sense of our level of interest in him?